Case study:Babbs Mill reed bed

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:33, 4 April 2014 by NickRRC (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.50
(2 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 29' 19.58" N, 1° 45' 43.95" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Will
Main contact surname Groves
Main contact user ID User:Wgroves
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Friends of Kingfisher Park
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Babbs Mill lake reedbed via Google satellite image

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The project will help improve the water quality of both Babb’s Mill lake and the River Cole and should also eradicate the unpleasant smell associated with one of the waterways in the area, known locally as the ‘smelly brook’.

A new reed bed has been created (March 2013) to improve water quality in Babbs Mill lake by cleansing the urban watercourse which flows through York’s Wood.

At the same time the watercourse itself was restored as it was broken out of its existing concrete channel and into a more natural course.

It's hoped that the more natural and visible watercourse will help deter fly tipping and increase the reporting of pollution incidents.

A shallow-water shelf was also created in Babbs Mill Lake from material excavated during the creation of the reedbed. This area will be allowed to develop into a second reed bed providing additional treatment of the watercourse.

Photos of the scheme are available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/environment-agency/sets/72157632746487191/#

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Babbs Mill reedbed creation
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Tame Anker and Mease

Subcatchment

River name R Cole from Springfield to Hatchford-Kingshurst Brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 154154 m <br />0.154 km <br />15,400 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB104028042502



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Heybarnes Recreation Ground Cole Restoration


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed 2013/03/29
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Urbanisation
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Width & depth variation
Biology
Physico-chemical Oxygen balance, Specific synthetic pollutants
Other reasons for the project Water quality, Community demand, Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information