Case study:Trees on the River Uck

From RESTORE
Revision as of 09:22, 31 March 2014 by SandraMJ (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 57' 59.09" N, 0° 5' 45.29" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Sandra
Main contact surname Manning-Jones
Main contact user ID User:SandraMJ
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://www.treesontheriveruck.org.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Aims and objectives TRUck Vision

To develop a pilot project that highlights the role of natural riparian and floodplain intervention measures in managing flood risk in a discreet river catchment (the River Uck) through delivery of natural riparian and floodplain interventions such as wet woodland.

Subsidiary Vision

To document and provide evidence of the ecosystem service and biodiversity benefits accrued from applying a naturalistic landscape-scale flood risk management strategy to the Uck catchment.

Aims of the TRUck Project To form an innovative partnership between Sussex Wildlife Trust, Environment Agency, Woodland Trust and other partners that delivers the project vision.

To deliver the aims of the Water Framework Directive and Ouse Catchment Flood Management Plan through natural floodplain enhancements in order to:
       o Help decrease velocities of flood flows by naturally increasing the in-channel and floodplain roughness of the Uck catchment. 
       o Help decrease unnecessary drainage and run-off from the catchment upstream of Uckfield.
       o Help increase the carrying capacity of washlands and the water storage capacity of the Uck.
       o Help all waterbodies in the project area to achieve ‘good’ ecological and chemical status.

To engage the public, landowners, farmers and stakeholders in the process of promoting good practice catchment management. To help others to have a better understanding of natural flooding and river processes and their implications for catchment management.


Objectives

Delivery Identify suitable sites for Catchment Riparian Intervention Measures (CRIMs) and floodplain habitat and natural flood storage enhancements through the analysis, interpretation and collation of research and GIS data. Produce a project plan outlining timings and focus areas for the project. Support and facilitate the appropriate installation of CRIMs and other riparian enhancements such as floodplain woodland. Set up an effective monitoring system along the river to assess the effects of TRUck project work.

Communication Promote natural processes and naturalistic river and floodplain restoration methods and encourage others to implement them in appropriate locations. Promote the TrUck project, its outputs and landowner offers (such as tree planting) through literature, events, communications and other media. Provide an accessible and informative project ‘hub’ and public face for the TrUck project materials. Hold stakeholder and community engagement events, and a project presence at other events where appropriate. Produce a project summary using TrUck as a case study of best practice and lessons learnt from project delivery.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information