Case study:Arborfield nature like bypass and weirs project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:50, 17 August 2012 by Mattleeson (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.50
(2 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 24' 19.55" N, 0° 55' 42.70" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Loddon at Arborfield
WFD water body codes GB106039023160
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Loddon (Swallowfield to River Thames confluence)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Target fish species: sea trout, eels, dace, barbel, chub, roach, bullhead, lamprey and pike.
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 800m0.8 km <br />80,000 cm <br />
Project started 2010/06/30
Works started
Works completed 2011/07/06
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) ~596"~" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources DEFRA, Environment Agency FCRM and Fisheries, Thames Water, Barbel Society

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 100 - 500 k€ 120120 k€ <br />120,000 € <br />
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 100 - 500 k€ ~450"~" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring 10 - 50 k€ 2424 k€ <br />24,000 € <br />



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology Weirs preventing fish passage upstream.
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Flood mitigation.


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of 80m of (riffle habitat) spawning gravels.
Floodplain / River corridor Thames Water weir lowering and repair work to four out of five structures - to lower upstream water levels and reduce overbank flow frequency.
Planform / Channel pattern Construction of 200m weir bypass channel to create free fish migration status. Two backwater areas created towards the end of the bypass channel and directly downstream of its exit.
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Presentations and meetings with local citizens. Volunteers involved in construction and future management of project.


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Channel pattern/planform Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Awaiting results
Invertebrates Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Macrophytes Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Habitat mapping Yes Yes Yes Yes No Awaiting results


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


P3200027.JPG
PB150207.JPG
PB110093.JPG
PA120219.JPG
RIMG0192.JPG
P5250283.JPG


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information