Case study:Arborfield nature like bypass and weirs project
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 24' 19.55" N, 0° 55' 42.70" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Dominic |
Main contact surname | Martyn |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | Loddon at Arborfield |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB106039023160 |
WFD (national) typology | Low, Medium, Calcareous |
WFD water body name | Loddon (Swallowfield to River Thames confluence) |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 800m0.8 km <br />80,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2010/06/30 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2011/07/06 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | more than 10000 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | ~596"~" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property. |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | DEFRA, Environment Agency FCRM and Fisheries, Thames Water, Barbel Society |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | 100 - 500 k€ | 120120 k€ <br />120,000 € <br /> | |||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | ~450"~" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property. | ||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring | 10 - 50 k€ | 2424 k€ <br />24,000 € <br /> |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | Weirs preventing fish passage upstream. |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Creation of 80m of (riffle habitat) spawning gravels. |
Floodplain / River corridor | Thames Water weir lowering and repair work to four out of five structures - to lower upstream water levels and reduce overbank flow frequency. |
Planform / Channel pattern | Construction of 200m weir bypass channel to create free fish migration status. Two backwater areas created towards the end of the bypass channel and directly downstream of its exit. |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other | Presentations and meetings with local citizens. Volunteers involved in construction and future management of project. |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative
|
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Awaiting results |
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Awaiting results |
Macrophytes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Awaiting results |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Spot flow measurements | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Awaiting results |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information