Case study:River Kennet Restoration at Durnsford

From RESTORE
Revision as of 08:35, 17 August 2012 by R Vause (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 25' 4.44" N, 1° 30' 27.86" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations Natural England
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Subcatchment:Kennet


Site

Edit site
Name Denford Common
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight, Embanked, High width:depth
Reference morphology Pool-riffle, Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Area of Special Conservation Interest
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Cobble, Estuarine mud, Silt
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 9.759.75 m³/s <br />9,750 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 2000 m2 km <br />200,000 cm <br />
Project started 2009/10/01
Works started
Works completed 2010/03/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Invasive species
Hydromorphology Flow velocities, Substrate conditions, Channel pattern/planform, Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Recreation, Habitat enhancement


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Regrading, Introduction of LWD and CWD, Removal of invasive species, Placement of gravels, Cut back of trees, Depth variation
Floodplain / River corridor Re-connection to adjacent floodplain, Creation of wetlands
Planform / Channel pattern Narrowing, Introduction of sinuousity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Management of organic and inorganic sediments
Social measures (incl. engagement) Improved public access
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Flow velocities Yes Yes Awaiting results
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information