Case study:River Wensum Rehabilitation Project - Bintree

From RESTORE
Revision as of 15:50, 8 August 2012 by R Vause (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 46' 52.77" N, 0° 57' 38.38" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Subcatchment:River Wensum


Site

Edit site
Name Bintree
WFD water body codes GB105034051100
WFD (national) typology R19
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel
Reference morphology Single channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Groundwater
Dominant substrate Gravel
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 1500 m1.5 km <br />150,000 cm <br />
Project started 2000/08/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2010/10/01
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 73 k€73,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Environment Ahgency Simon Johnson
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision Environment Agency Rob Dryden
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Agriculture
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Connection to groundwaters
Biology Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Flood risk management, Community demand


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications bed raising
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern channel narrowing
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Participation in maintenance


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Invertebrates: Taxonomic composition Yes Yes

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description
http://therrc.co.uk/case studies/wensum-%20bintree.pdf River Restoration Centre Case Study 2009
http://therrc.co.uk/case studies/wensum%20at%20bintree%20final.pdf River Restoration Centre Case Study 2010

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information