Case study:The Dart and Teign River Improvement Project (DTRIP)

From RESTORE
Revision as of 09:50, 6 June 2013 by Marinela (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 23' 37.09" N, 3° 37' 26.81" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Layla
Main contact surname Ousley
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Westcountry Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Natural England, Dartmoor National Park, Dart Fisheries Association, Teign Fisheries Association, Duchy of Cornwall, Dartmoor Hill Farm Project, Fountains Forestry, South West Water, Forestry Commission, University College London
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


DTRIP is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to manage restoration work and to deliver habitat improvements in the Dart and Teign catchment. The partnership, led by the Westcountry Rivers Trust, has been working together for many years, carrying out river restoration and addressing the causes of Wa-ter Framework Directive issues.Through restoration work, the project will address issues including: sediment, which has a direct adverse effect on water quality; diffuse pollution from agriculture and roads, which can impact on river ecology and causes WFD failures; barriers to fish migration, preventing fish from reaching habitat where modeling shows they should be present; interrupted conveyance of river gravels, resulting in reduced spawning habitats for salmonids; habitat loss of wetted and wooded land that has an important role to play in improving water quality & quantity; acidified moorland that creates low pH levels that are detrimental to ecological health of the rivers.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Drinking water storage and supply
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Gravel Augmentation
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, PH
Other reasons for the project Economic, Social


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Marginal planting, Removal of weir
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information