Case study:Roe and Ive

From RESTORE
Revision as of 15:57, 5 November 2018 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 47' 41.51" N, 2° 57' 12.73" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/32_roeive.pdf
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Catherine
Main contact surname McIlwraith
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Eden Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.edenriverstrust.org.uk/
Partner organisations Roe Catchment Community Water Management Group, Environment Agency, Durham University, Catchment Sensitive Farming, Cumbria County Council, Forestry Commission, Woodland Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This is a community-led project in the catchments of the Roe and Ive Becks in Cumbria (Map 1) where the Roe Catchment Community Water Management Group, the Eden Rivers Trust, the Environment Agency, Durham University, Catchment Sensitive Farming, Cumbria County Council, the Forestry Commission and the Woodland Trust are working in partnership. A Masters by Research (MRes) project at Durham University commissioned by the project has identified the most important locations and techniques for reducing peak flow, and is now carrying out subsoiling, implementing targeted tree planting and creating leaky dams. The project is also one of the Cumbria Flood Partnership pilot catchments. There has been a positive approach to self-help with individual property resilience measures installed and a community flood warden scheme now in place. The local community has been flooded 3 times. In 2005 and 2013 many houses were catastrophically flooded, with the property repairs taking over a year in several cases and some residents forced out of their homes. Working with Durham University this project has implemented various Natural Flood Management (NFM) measures to help reduce flood risk. To date this includes: • soil aeration/subsoiling across 156 acres (63.1ha) • installation of 25 leaky dams Local residents have installed property level resilience measures, which alongside these NFM measures, helps to make their properties more resilient to flooding.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Roe and Ive
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2013
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) £50k"£" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency, Roe Catchment Community Water Management Group, Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF), Eden Rivers Trust, Landowner

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information