Case study:Houghton 'trout stream' enhancements

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:26, 14 May 2014 by Robclapham (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 19' 30.02" N, 0° 6' 26.70" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Clapham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Installation of a mid-channel 'v' deflector to create and maintain clean gravels

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Houghton ’trout’ stream is an important side channel of the Great Ouse providing many habitat types that are not present in the navigable main channel.

Over the last decade there has been a decline in the number of fish species present in the stream. This is likely a result of historic over-widening, catchment sediment issues and flow regulation which have changed or degraded the habitat.

The Environment Agency worked with the local fishing club and landowners to improve the status of the stream putting in place a number of measures to address pressures and improve habitat.


These measures include:

- Gravel Cleaning has been carried out to improve spawning gravels. Limited flows in an over-wide channel have resulted in a lot of fine sediment to drop out of suspension and smother the gravels. High powered jets of water are used to remove silt between gravels and improve the chances of successful fish spawning.

- Tree Planting has been started in various locations. Trees will provide shelter and shade for various fish species as well as habitat for macroinvertebrates. In future years they will provide woody material to the channel which will help create in-channel habitat. They are also important for moderating river water temperatures.

- Wooden flow deflectors have been installed in a number of locations on the stream. These increase flow velocities over the spawning gravel preventing build up of fine sediment in slow flows. These should be self sustaining and reduce the need to gravel clean by hand each year.

- Flow improvement works have been carried out at the weir. Overhanging and submerged trees, and vegetation has been removed to improve flows and prevent further build up of materials and sediment.

- Fencing will be installed in summer 2014 to protect trees from cattle and prevent in-channel access close to enhanced spawning riffles

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Pre-enhancement fish surveys have been undertaken
Post-enhancement fish surveys will be carried out in subsequent years

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Wood for construction of deflectors was sourced locally and work was undertaken by hand. Therefore the size of deflectors were limited to what could be manoeuvred by hand. Despite their size, careful consideration of the prevailing flow and sediment conditions meant they could be placed to achieve optimum benefit.


Image gallery


File:Lamprey Spawing.mov

Local angling club planting trees on banktop
Example of side deflector
Chub preparing to spawn around 'v' deflector
Finished deflector in May 2014
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Upper and Bedford Ouse

Subcatchment

River name Ouse (Roxton to Earith)
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 6565 m <br />0.065 km <br />6,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033047921



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Houghton 'trout stream' enhancements


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Land drainage
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of wooden deflectors, Cleaning of spawning gravels
Floodplain / River corridor Fencing, Tree planting
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information