Case study:Dove Weir removal
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 53° 2' 0.13" N, 1° 45' 39.48" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Spatial planning |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Nick |
Main contact surname | Elbourne |
Main contact user ID | User:NickRRC |
Contact organisation | River Restoration Centre |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The Leek and District Fly Fishing Association (LDFFA) undertook work to remove an artificial weir in an attempt to restore a more natural flow to the river. The river was also 're-wilded' to introduce woody debris and other material to enhance fish habitats.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Anglian |
---|---|
River basin | Broadland Rivers |
Subcatchment
River name | Dove |
---|---|
Area category | 100 - 1000 km² |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | Less than 100 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | 6969 m <br />0.069 km <br />6,900 cm <br /> |
Dominant geology | Calcareous |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | Arable and Horticulture |
Waterbody ID | GB105034045710 |
Site
Name | Dovedale |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Single channel, Impounded, High width:depth, Embanked |
Reference morphology | Single channel, Pool-riffle |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | true |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | Area of Special Conservation Interest |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | Gravel, Silt |
River corridor land use | Woodland, Extensive agriculture |
Average bankfull channel width category | 10 - 50 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 5 - 10 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 1000 m1 km <br />100,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2010/07/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2010/08/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | Less than 10 k€"Less than 10 k€" is not in the list (Less than 1 k€, 1 - 10 k€, 10 - 50 k€, 50 - 100 k€, 100 - 500 k€, 500 - 1000 k€, 1000 - 5000 k€, 5000 - 10000 k€, more than 10000 k€) of allowed values for the "Total cost category" property. |
Total cost (k€) | 2 k€2,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association | ||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association | ||||
Works and works supervision | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association | ||||
Post-project management and maintenance | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association | ||||
Monitoring | Leek and District Fly Fishing Association |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Vegetation cut back |
Floodplain / River corridor | Trees felled |
Planform / Channel pattern | Removal of a weir, Increase in sinuousity |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Substrate conditions | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish: Species composition | Yes | Yes | Yes | Awaiting results | ||
Fish: Abundance | Yes | Yes | Yes | Awaiting results |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|