Case study:Dorset CPAF Projects

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:38, 29 April 2016 by DorsetWR (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 48' 0.41" N, 2° 0' 10.05" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Jacob
Main contact surname Dew
Main contact user ID User:DorsetWR
Contact organisation Dorset Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.dorsetwildlifetrust.org.uk
Partner organisations FWAG SW, Kingston Waurward College, Wessex Chalk Streams and Rivers Trust, Litter Free Coast and Sea, Dorset Coastal Forum, Bournemouth Borough Council
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Dorset CPAF Projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Dorset Wildlife Trust CPAF projects delivered results through a series of specific projects, tailor-made for issues found on the ground across Dorset in a variety of locations. Projects on the Stour linked to the receptor coastal water bodies as well as supporting refuges for coarse fish populations. Projects on the Corfe showed proactive work and how small scale land management projects can benefit the water course. Projects on the Frome were linked to existing restoration plans and will engage with farmers of the future.

Frome (lower) - This project enhanced the wildlife value of the floodplain and slowed the flow of water with simple water control structures. Complementary works to increase light to ordinary watercourses through tree management and in channel enhancements to benefit fish interest were also undertaken. The project improved the floodplains link to the river and increased nutrient loading capacity.

The Corfe River - In 2014, FWAG SW undertook a scoping study of the waterbody to identify problems, restoration habitat opportunities (both in-channel and on adjacent riparian habitat) and potential land management change opportunities. From this, some simple and quick-win restoration projects were identified to help reduce bank erosion, create marginal habitat, and increase light to the watercourse. Pasture pumps and drinking troughs have been installed, Drinking bays fenced off, River margins fenced and Trees crowned to let light in and promote marginal vegetation growth.

Bourne Stream - Only Rain Down The Drain; A solution was needed to help Bournemouth town centre businesses (specifically food outlets to tackle the issues of surface water contamination leading to negative impacts on bathing water quality. The project focussed on improving understanding of what can and cannot be poured down surface water drains, the negative impact pollutants put into the drain can have on bathing water quality directly and the wider social and economic impacts to the area if poor bathing water quality is recorded at Bournemouth beaches. Businesses were motivated to change behaviour around surface water drains so that only rain goes down the drain.

Tarrant: The project is trialling techniques to successfully establish wetland plant/meadow communities in high nutrient conditions. The project will develop a bespoke species rich floodplain grassland/meadow seed mix and sow in a floodplain with the seed bank, soil fertility, site hydrology and ecology monitored over a 5yr period.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information