Case study:Alma Road Rain Gardens

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:17, 12 February 2016 by EnfieldWatercourses (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 38' 47.70" N, 0° 2' 3.53" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Jamie
Main contact surname Kukadia
Main contact user ID User:London Borough of Enfield
Contact organisation London Borough of Enfield
Contact organisation web site http://enfield.gov.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Alma Road is situated in Ponders End, a deprived area in the London Borough of Enfield. The area is known to suffer some localised surface water flooding, due to the impermeable nature of the surroundings created by the expanse of hard-surfaces, lack of green spaces and inadequate capacity in the existing drainage system.

This part of Enfield is generally low lying, as it forms part of the Lee Valley. The natural flow path to the nearby watercourse, Brimsdown Ditch, a tributary of the Salmons Brook/River Lee, is obstructed by the adjacent railway line and exacerbates surface water flood risk. When it rains the runoff from Alma Road picks up a large amount of pollutants, drains into the highways gullies and is fed into the Brimsdown Ditch.

Rain Gardens are a type of Sustainable Drainage (also known as “SuDS”) which mimics natural drainage by allowing water to soak naturally into the ground.

The project will retrofit five Rain Gardens into the highway realm, with a total area of 200m2 along a 200m stretch of Alma Road, with the aims of:

• Reducing surface water flood risk on the highway, as highlighted in the London Borough of Enfield’s Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (2015) • Water quality improvements to surface water runoff and the receiving Brimsdown Ditch by removing runoff from the conventional drainage system • Improving biodiversity by planting a wide variety of species • Horizontal traffic management by slowing down traffic in proximity to the school, bus stop and several wide junctions that are currently not pedestrian-friendly • Aesthetic enhancement of the road and the surrounding area • Improving public perception of SuDS through school and community engagement • Inspiring more green infrastructure SuDS development across the borough

In later phases, the Alma Road Rain Gardens will be complemented by an additional 400m of SuDS features along the highway and across the 7Ha site of the Alma Regeneration Project.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information