Case study:Meades water garden regeneration project
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Nick |
Main contact surname | Elbourne |
Main contact user ID | User:NickRRC |
Contact organisation | River Restoration Centre |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.therrc.co.uk |
Partner organisations | Chiltern Chalk Streams Project |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Two weirs were removed and the site allowed to drain. A temporary dam was built at the top of the site and river flow was piped around the working area. Working from the upstream end, a new channel was dug through the accumulated silt following the line of preferential flow. Nicospan was installed to provide support to the new channel sides and to ensure separation of the silt from the gravel infill, which was imported to form the new river bed. It was important to allow at least 500mm of gravel to provide the depth that chalkstream invertebrates require for their life stage. Excavated silt was distributed around the site within the boundary of old ponds. The new channel was tied into the original course of the river which flowed around the back of the island in the lower pond. A low-lying bund was installed in place of the weir to create a wetland feature. Following completion of the river restoration work, new paths were laid in the
gardens and an interpretation board installed.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Thames |
---|---|
River basin | Colne |
Subcatchment
River name | Chess |
---|---|
Area category | 10 - 100 km² |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | 200 - 500 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | 278278 m <br />0.278 km <br />27,800 cm <br /> |
Dominant geology | Calcareous |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | Improved grassland |
Waterbody ID | GB106039029870 |
Site
Name | Meades Water Garden |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB106039029870 |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | Chess |
Pre-project morphology | Single channel, Straight, High width:depth |
Reference morphology | Single channel, Sinuous, Step-pool, Pool-riffle |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | UK - Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Groundwater |
Dominant substrate | Bedrock, Gravel |
River corridor land use | Urban |
Average bankfull channel width category | 5 - 10 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 0.5 - 2 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 120 m0.12 km <br />12,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2007/01/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2008/01/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 50 - 100 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 78 k€78,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Planting, Introduction of gravel, Two weir removed |
Floodplain / River corridor | Removal of diseased vegetation, Wetland created |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other | Public consultation, Information provision |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Macrophytes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement | ||
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|---|
http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/meades%20water%20garden.pdf | River Restoration Centre Case Study |