Case study:London Olympics Parklands: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
|Name=Olympic Parkland | |||
|WFD water body name=River Lea | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|River corridor land use=Urban, | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Revision as of 14:03, 4 March 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Spatial planning |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Mike |
Main contact surname | Vaughan |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Atkins, Olympic Development Authority |
Contact organisation web site | http://http://www.landscapeinstitute.org/knowledge/olympics.php |
Partner organisations | Atkins, Olympic Development Authority, Environment Agency, Natural England |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Olympic Park will bring lasting benefits to east London. After the Games, it will be transformed to include a huge urban park. The new park will link the tidal Thames Estuary to the south and the Hertfordshire countryside to the north.
Some of the major benefits to the environment include:
- 8kms of river restored
- 4,000 homes protected from flood
- 2 million tonnes soil decontaminated
- The largest urban park created in Europe for over 100 years
Native species planted, including oak, ash, willow, birch, hazel, holly, blackthorn and hawthorn – a home for wildlife in the middle of the city. 30,000 tonnes of silt removed from waterways. 280 hectares of brownfield land cleaned.
750 bat roost and bird boxes put on site.
45 hectares of wildlife habitat created.
20 million gallons of contaminated groundwater treated.
4000 homes in West Ham and Canning Town have reduced flood risk.
99.5 per cent of construction waste re-used, recycled or recovered.
98 per cent of material from demolition work re-used, recycled or recovered.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | Olympic Parkland |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | River Lea |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | Yes |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | Urban |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information