Case study:London Olympics Parklands: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:
}}
}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Site
|Name=Olympic Parkland
|WFD water body name=River Lea
|Heavily modified water body=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=Yes
|River corridor land use=Urban,
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}

Revision as of 14:03, 4 March 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 32' 49.21" N, 0° 1' 2.57" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Spatial planning
Country England
Main contact forename Mike
Main contact surname Vaughan
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Atkins, Olympic Development Authority
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.landscapeinstitute.org/knowledge/olympics.php
Partner organisations Atkins, Olympic Development Authority, Environment Agency, Natural England
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Olympic Park will bring lasting benefits to east London. After the Games, it will be transformed to include a huge urban park. The new park will link the tidal Thames Estuary to the south and the Hertfordshire countryside to the north.

Some of the major benefits to the environment include:

  • 8kms of river restored
  • 4,000 homes protected from flood
  • 2 million tonnes soil decontaminated
  • The largest urban park created in Europe for over 100 years

Native species planted, including oak, ash, willow, birch, hazel, holly, blackthorn and hawthorn – a home for wildlife in the middle of the city. 30,000 tonnes of silt removed from waterways. 280 hectares of brownfield land cleaned.

750 bat roost and bird boxes put on site.

45 hectares of wildlife habitat created.

20 million gallons of contaminated groundwater treated.

4000 homes in West Ham and Canning Town have reduced flood risk.

99.5 per cent of construction waste re-used, recycled or recovered.

98 per cent of material from demolition work re-used, recycled or recovered.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Olympic Parkland
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name River Lea
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Olympic Parklands Green Infrastructure ODA document

Talk by Mike Vaughan of Atkins on the river works


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information