Case study:Llobregat river restoration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | {{Image_gallery_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=041 Rio Llobregat.pdf | |||
|Description=Additional documentation (in Spanish) | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_header}} |
Revision as of 11:35, 20 February 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | Spain |
Main contact forename | Joan |
Main contact surname | Feliú |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Acciónatura |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The river Llobregat lower course is the result of centuries of human activity. Historically it has tried to avoid overflows and maintain a constant channel in order to gain land for agriculture and to capture water for irrigation and industry. In recent years, construction of major infrastructures such as highway, the TGV and other service roads have come to narrow the river steadily reducing temporary floodplain.
The important aspects are summarized in the following features: creating favorable conditions (morphological and hydraulic); stabilize the channel and enable the growth of vegetation compatible with the frequency of floods and flooding near the river; create riverside communities continue to function as a corridor; promote native species and eliminate the alien; recover the riparian habitat and all; lost and refuge areas for wildlife habitat; encourage and facilitate the enjoyment of the river by the population, with emphasis on landscape and ecological aspects and fen-it compatible with conservation.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Pirineo Oriental |
---|---|
River basin | Llobregat |
Subcatchment
River name | Llobregat |
---|---|
Area category | |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | Less than 100 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | 25 m0.025 km <br />2,500 cm <br /> |
Dominant geology | |
Ecoregion | Ibero-Macaronesian |
Dominant land cover | Urban |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Increased biodiversity, river Llobregat, Sallent.
Site
Name | Pallejà |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Sinuous, Braided |
Reference morphology | Sinuous, Braided |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | Urban |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | 20.7720.77 m³/s <br />20,770 l/s <br /> |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 170 m0.17 km <br />17,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2009/01/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2010/01/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | ACA 70%, Accionatura 30% |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | Structure & condition of riparian zones, Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Revetmens with local species, Bank stabilization |
Floodplain / River corridor | Riparian tree planting, Control of invasive species, Silvicultural treatments |
Planform / Channel pattern | Remove obstacles in the riverbed |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|