Case study:Rye Harbour Farm Regulated Tidal Exchange: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Approved
}}
{{Location
|Location=50.9318306, 0.7695951000000605
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
Line 24: Line 30:
|Project title=Rye Harbour Farm Regulated Tidal Exchange
|Project title=Rye Harbour Farm Regulated Tidal Exchange
}}
}}
{{Case study status
 
|Approval status=Approved
}}
{{Location
|Location=50.9318306, 0.7695951000000605
}}


{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Latest revision as of 10:45, 10 December 2024

4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 55' 54.59" N, 0° 46' 10.54" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/53_ryeharbour.pdf
Themes Estuary, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Marine, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Tom
Main contact surname Cook
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations East Sussex County Council, Rother District Council, Sussex Wildlife Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Regulated Tidal Exchange is the regulated exchange of seawater to an area behind fixed sea defences, through engineered structures (e.g. sluices, tide‐gates or pipes) to create saline or brackish habitats. This regulated tidal exchange project involved a combination of Working with Natural Processes (WWNP) and traditional measures to manage flood risk and create/restore habitat on the Sussex coast at Rye Harbour (Map 1).

  • A secondary defence bund to protect low-lying communities
  • Non-intervention shingle primary defence within a Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
  • Creation of a tidal exchange to provide an intertidal habitat area landward of the primary defence
  • Creation of a large tidal creek into the site to provide an important area of saltmarsh, creeks and intertidal mud (Photo 1)
  • Saline lagoons and vegetated shingle created
  • Coastal grazing marsh and ponds created on landward of the secondary defence

In November 2013, a tidal surge entered the habitat creation area, providing a large area of tidal storage, which was then gradually released via the new creek. The habitats are robust enough to respond positively to tidal changes and also provide a large area where water can be harmlessly stored. The shingle beach is part of the Dungeness SAC and is Europe's largest area of coastal vegetated shingle. The huge diversity of plants and invertebrates makes this one of the country's most important sites for wildlife.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.



Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Rother Estuary
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2003
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) £1.6m"£" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Flood Defence Grant-in-Aid, Environment Agency, Sussex Wildlife Trust

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood and coastal erosion protection
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Salt marsh and mudflat restoration
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information