Case study:Chinbrook Meadows Wetlands: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 196: Line 196:
|Other motivation=Local amenity and community education
|Other motivation=Local amenity and community education
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Partial diversion of river
|Floodplain / River corridor=Wetland habitat,
|Management interventions=Planting wildflower mixes, Riparian tree planting, plug planting
|Social measures=Community Events, Community consultation, Community Events, Community Litter-picking work, Volunteer work parties using the local community.,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Revision as of 11:04, 19 July 2024

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 25' 36.24" N, 0° 1' 36.91" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://https://www.thames21.org.uk/improving-rivers/chinbrook-community-suds-healthy-wetlands-challenge/
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Jo
Main contact surname Goad
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Thames21
Contact organisation web site http://www.thames21.org.uk/
Partner organisations Environment Agency, ERCIP / London Borough of Lewisham, Friends of Chinbrook Meadows, QWAG, Bonneville Environmental Foundation, Greater London Authority
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
A picture taken in May 2024 of two of the four wetland cells

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Ravensbourne is a tributary of the River Thames, flowing for 17km from its spring in Keston, London Borough of Bromley, to its confluence with the Thames at Deptford. The area around the Ravensbourne is mainly urban and residential. However, it does flow through some greenspaces, including Chinbrook Meadows on the Bromley/ Lewisham boarder where the wetland is located.

The site was previously a lightly used recreational field on the edge of a series of fields that make up Chinbrook Meadows. Anecdotally, the field was mainly used by dog walkers but was not as well used as other sections of the wider park. Grove Park Ditch runs from the northwest to the southeast, parallel to the south east railway line, where it joins the River Quaggy, a tributary of the River Ravensbourne. The ditch had become blocked and foul smelling, so the Friends of Chinbrook Meadows reported the problem to the London Borough of Lewisham, who manage the site. Alongside Thames21 a plan for a series of wetland scrapes was developed to treat the water from the ditch before it enters the River Quaggy.

The main outcome of the project is to improve water quality of the River Quaggy through increased removal of pollutants from surface water through the processes that will occur within the constructed wetland (sediment trapping, nutrient removal and chemical detoxification). Additionally, this project will involve the local community and learnings from this wetland project can be shared across the Ravensbourne Catchment Partnership. This will boost awareness of challenges to rivers and how nature-based solutions can tackle these. The aims of the project are fourfold:

1. Improve water quality of the River Quaggy and reduce foul smells on site

• The wetland uses wetland flora to naturally clean diverted water from the ditch before it enters the River Quaggy.

2. Improve biodiversity and amenity value of the land

• The wetland has replaced an area of grassland which had relatively low ecological value. Wetlands are well established self-sustaining ecosystems with high value flora and fauna.

• Additionally, footpaths, wildflower meadows and interpretation boards will increase public access to the site and provide an opportunity to learn about aquatic habitats.

3. Natural flood management

• The wetland will provide additional storage of rainfall during high rainfall events and slow the flows of the River Quaggy.

4. Community Engagement

• Provide volunteering opportunities through activities such as water quality monitoring pre- and post-wetland creation, planting and vegetation management to engage the wider community in the long-term.

In the autumn 0f 2023, the wetlands were excavated. During the winter and spring of 23/24, a series of well-attended volunteering events were run to get the wetlands ready to be re-opened. The site was litter picked, hedgerows and dead hedges were installed and over 2,600 plug plants were planted in and around the ponds. In addition, a footpath and turf was laid to improve accessibility and a wildflower meadow was established on the earth mound. The park was re-opened to the public in the summer of 2024 with an ongoing maintenance and monitoring plan agreed with the landowners and managers in place for 2025 onwards.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


2016 Pre-intervention data:

Water Quality Sampling Summary (January - May 2016)

Sampling Locations:

1. Manhole at the top of Grove Park ditch

2. Inflow to Grove Park ditch proper

3. Outflow from Grove Park ditch into the Quaggy River

Results:

Nutrients:

1. Nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N):

- Classified as good in all locations.

- Highest concentration: 5.25 mg/L (manhole).

2. Ammoniacal-nitrogen (NH3-N):

- Rated good at the manhole and ditch inflow, very good at the ditch outflow.

- Highest concentration after a long dry spell.

- Decreases from manhole to outflow due to nitrification cycle.

3. Total Nitrogen:

- Not monitored by WFD but poor according to European Nitrogen Assessment (ENA).

- Highest at the manhole (max: 14.2 mg/L, avg: 9.0 mg/L).

4. Phosphate (orthophosphate):

- Rated poor at the manhole, moderate in ditch locations.

- High variability in the manhole.

Heavy Metals:

1. Lead:

- Present in all samples, highest in the manhole (max: 0.4 mg/L).

2. Zinc:

- Below detection limits in ditch samples, present in manhole samples (avg: 0.3 mg/L).

3. Cadmium:

- Below detection limits in 50% of manhole samples, present at avg: 0.04 mg/L when detected.

4. Copper:

- Present in manhole samples, some ditch inflow, minimal ditch outflow. Max: 0.6 mg/L (manhole).

Other Parameters:

1. pH: Good in all sites.

2. Conductivity: No significant change between sites.

3. Coliform Bacteria: Improved from poor (manhole) to good (outflow).

4. BOD5 (Biochemical Oxygen Demand): Rated poor at all sites, slight improvement from manhole to outflow.

Post- intervention monitoring

ZSL Urban Wetland Monitoring Initiative

Chinbrook Meadows wetlands will host a trial citizen science project to monitor the health of the ponds. Developed by ZSL, the monitoring initiative will began in August 2024.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Community engagement

- Early and consistent community engagement is key

- Posters aren’t enough. Leaflets, presence at community events, word of mouth and meeting with councillors are all useful engagement techniques.

- Communicating nuance is difficult. Conversations around flood risk, biodiversity and water quality require care and patience. The importance of using language that is easily understood cannot be understated.

Logistics

- Construction site difficulties/ break ins. Securing the site was difficult with frequent break ins and vandalism.

- Deliveries to parks are difficult, especially here as a tunnel under the railway track restricts the vehicle size.

- Close relations with the council and contractors is key for support.


Image gallery


1.1.jpg
Chinbrookpond.jpg
B7d74c50-c17e-4f26-ab04-d1159650299e.jpg
Chinbrookpond2.jpg
Chinbrookpond1.jpg
E8033acf-dc87-4fbd-b34b-cade49c1052a.jpg
Image.jpeg
Chinbrook construction OCT23 5173.JPG
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Chinbrook Meadows
WFD water body codes GB106039023290
WFD (national) typology Calcareous
WFD water body name Quaggy
Pre-project morphology Ditch
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Wetland
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Metropolitan Open Land
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 185185 m <br />0.185 km <br />18,500 cm <br />
Project started 2016
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency, Greater London Authority, Bonneville Environmental Foundation

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design London Borough of Lewisham
Stakeholder engagement and communication Thames21
Works and works supervision Thames21
Post-project management and maintenance Glendale
Monitoring Ravensbourne Catchment Partnership



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Natural Flood Management
Hydromorphology Wetland creation
Biology Improving biodiversity
Physico-chemical Poor water quality
Other reasons for the project Local amenity and community education


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Partial diversion of river
Floodplain / River corridor Wetland habitat
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Planting wildflower mixes, Riparian tree planting, plug planting
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community Events, Community consultation, Community Events, Community Litter-picking work, Volunteer work parties using the local community.
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information