Case study:Stainby Road, Colsterworth: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.80026977522567, -0.6256366590738383 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Stainby Road, Colsterworth |Stat...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Stainby Road, Colsterworth
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=David
|Main contact forename=Gail
|Main contact surname=Hutchinson
|Main contact surname=Talton
|Main contact id=N/A
|Main contact id=N/A
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency (in an advisory role)
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=eastmercia.org/
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency,
|Name of parent multi-site project=yes
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=yes
|Project picture=Colsterworth October 2023.JPG
|Picture description=October 2023 just after construction
|Project summary=This project was delivered by East Mercia Rivers Trust on land owned by Buckminster Estates. Although the Upper Witham which flows through the site had retained a meandering course, the river had become very disconnected from its floodplain with very little gravel in the channel. The aim of the project was to improve the river’s connectivity with the floodplain and in the process, enhance both river and floodplain habitat across the site. This was achieved by the lowering of areas of floodplain across the site and the introduction of limestone gravel riffles and point bars. The selective addition of woody material at certain locations further improved habitat.
 
A backwater was created along with floodplain ponds and the enhancement of spring tributaries from the valley sides allowed the creation of ground water fed scrapes. All material removed from the valley bottom was landscaped on the valley sides outside of the floodplain and planted with wildflower seed.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Project is very recent so just establishing. We have baseline data for fish and river habitat survey as well as detailed drone topo. Post monitoring work will commence from 24 on wards.
|Lessons learn=Allow plenty of time for the development and delivery of a large project such as this where the ecological window for delivery is very limited. Involve all stakeholders at the earliest possible stage of development. Due to the sensitivity of the site, archaeology was a major factor and where this is the case adequate funding should be accounted for to the help manage this risk. Future management of the site is very important to ensure that high quality floodplain habitats are created. Here, the tenant farmer will continue with low density, conservation cattle grazing. The project was carefully designed to not back up any water onto the field immediately upstream.
|Project title=Stainby Road, Colsterworth
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 11:18, 8 February 2024

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 48' 0.97" N, 0° 37' 32.29" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Gail
Main contact surname Talton
Main contact user ID User:N/A
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://eastmercia.org/
Partner organisations Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project

yes

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
October 2023 just after construction

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project was delivered by East Mercia Rivers Trust on land owned by Buckminster Estates. Although the Upper Witham which flows through the site had retained a meandering course, the river had become very disconnected from its floodplain with very little gravel in the channel. The aim of the project was to improve the river’s connectivity with the floodplain and in the process, enhance both river and floodplain habitat across the site. This was achieved by the lowering of areas of floodplain across the site and the introduction of limestone gravel riffles and point bars. The selective addition of woody material at certain locations further improved habitat.

A backwater was created along with floodplain ponds and the enhancement of spring tributaries from the valley sides allowed the creation of ground water fed scrapes. All material removed from the valley bottom was landscaped on the valley sides outside of the floodplain and planted with wildflower seed.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Project is very recent so just establishing. We have baseline data for fish and river habitat survey as well as detailed drone topo. Post monitoring work will commence from 24 on wards.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Allow plenty of time for the development and delivery of a large project such as this where the ecological window for delivery is very limited. Involve all stakeholders at the earliest possible stage of development. Due to the sensitivity of the site, archaeology was a major factor and where this is the case adequate funding should be accounted for to the help manage this risk. Future management of the site is very important to ensure that high quality floodplain habitats are created. Here, the tenant farmer will continue with low density, conservation cattle grazing. The project was carefully designed to not back up any water onto the field immediately upstream.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information