Case study:Rewilding the Rom: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
|Name=River Rom | |||
|WFD water body code=GB106037028120 | |||
|WFD water body name=Rom (Bourne Brook to Ravensbourne) Water Body | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Site designation=UK - Local Nature Reserve | |||
|Local site designation=Local Nature Reserve, | |||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Species=Himalayan Balsam, Japanese Knotweed, water vole (Arvicola terrestris), | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off, Groundwater, | |||
|Dominant substrate=Clay, Silt, | |||
|River corridor land use=Urban, Irrigated land, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Revision as of 16:01, 17 November 2023
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 33' 28.30" N, 0° 11' 2.29" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.thames21.org.uk/improving-rivers/rewilding-the-rom/ |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Carolina |
Main contact surname | Pinto |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Thames 21 |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.thames21.org.uk |
Partner organisations | London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, Environment Agency, Essex and Suffolk Water (Northumbrian Water), Kusuma Trust, Land of the Fanns, Thames Chase, Mayor of London |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|