Case study:Restoring Brent Rivers and Communities: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition, Invertebrates: Abundance, Invertebrates: Diversity,
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition, Invertebrates: Abundance, Invertebrates: Diversity,
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of bank reinforcements,
|Floodplain / River corridor=Restoration of pond, Maintenance of riparian vegetation,
|Management interventions=Litter picking,
|Social measures=Community Education, Community Events, Community Litter-picking work, Community involvement,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Revision as of 19:07, 9 February 2022

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://https://www.thames21.org.uk/brent-rivers-and-communities/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Carolina
Main contact surname Pinto
Main contact user ID User:Carolfp10
Contact organisation Thames 21
Contact organisation web site http://www.thames21.org.uk
Partner organisations Greggs Foundation, Brent Council, The Rivers Trust
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Volunteer Photographing river Brent at Quainton Street Open Space

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Restoring Brent Rivers and Communities project engaged local people in areas of high social deprivation in Barnet, Brent, Ealing and Harrow. Together we restored and improved sections of the river habitats with the aim to also increase community well-being. We increased access to the river and its paths, collaborating with local communities on practical river repair workshops, celebrating and sharing successes.

We aimed at the rewilding of sections of the river Brent by creating new wetlands, planting native aquatic plants, removing wooden toe-board and helping the river meander more naturally in its channel.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


LW Deflectors.JPG
Coir.jpg
Large wood Installation.JPEG
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Quainton Street Open Space
WFD water body codes GB106039023590
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Brent (below Silk stream down to the Thames)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 550550 m <br />0.55 km <br />55,000 cm <br />
Project started 2019/01/01
Works started 2020/09/01
Works completed 2021/03/15
Project completed 2022/03/31
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Greggs Foundation and GLA

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Physical Modifications
Hydromorphology Lack of diversity
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition, Invertebrates: Abundance, Invertebrates: Diversity
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Removal of bank reinforcements
Floodplain / River corridor Restoration of pond, Maintenance of riparian vegetation
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Litter picking
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community Education, Community Events, Community Litter-picking work, Community involvement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information