Case study:Oughtershaw NFM: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=54.23541001599681, -2.235692603737116 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Oughtershaw NFM |Status=Complete...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Oughtershaw NFM
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Line 16: Line 15:
|Contact organisation url=www.yorkshiredalesriverstrust.com
|Contact organisation url=www.yorkshiredalesriverstrust.com
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Buffer strip.jpg
|Picture description=Riparian Buffer Strips and Tree Planting
|Project summary=This project aims to incorporate and tackle many important issues through a integrated approach to catchment management. The core reason for the project was to setup a demonstration site for Natural Flood Management, however, this project also delivers a wide range of multiple benefits. It also identified the mechanisms that enable effective deliver by working with multiple landowners in a small subcathment. Collectively, working towards a natural capital approach which enables a wide range of public goods to be delivered through a multiple funding sources.
The main deliverables for this project has been:
installing leaky dams,
construction of earth bunds,
increasing riparian buffer strips,
tree planting,
scrape creation.
We have run engagement events to a number of groups (farmers, flood effected communities, other rivers trusts and partners), to increase awareness, inspire and encourage more Natural Flood management and partnership work to be delivered.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Monitoring the effectiveness of the bunds and leaky dams by installing time lapse cameras.
Monitoring visitor numbers and gathering feedback from visitors to understand the benefits of the guided walks and how we could make improvements
|Project title=Oughtershaw NFM
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 17:36, 4 March 2020

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 14' 7.48" N, 2° 14' 8.49" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename MARIE
Main contact surname TAYLOR
Main contact user ID User:MarieYDRT
Contact organisation Yorkshire Dales Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.yorkshiredalesriverstrust.com
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Riparian Buffer Strips and Tree Planting

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project aims to incorporate and tackle many important issues through a integrated approach to catchment management. The core reason for the project was to setup a demonstration site for Natural Flood Management, however, this project also delivers a wide range of multiple benefits. It also identified the mechanisms that enable effective deliver by working with multiple landowners in a small subcathment. Collectively, working towards a natural capital approach which enables a wide range of public goods to be delivered through a multiple funding sources. The main deliverables for this project has been: installing leaky dams, construction of earth bunds, increasing riparian buffer strips, tree planting, scrape creation. We have run engagement events to a number of groups (farmers, flood effected communities, other rivers trusts and partners), to increase awareness, inspire and encourage more Natural Flood management and partnership work to be delivered.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Monitoring the effectiveness of the bunds and leaky dams by installing time lapse cameras. Monitoring visitor numbers and gathering feedback from visitors to understand the benefits of the guided walks and how we could make improvements

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information