Case study:Yeading Brook Fields/Meadows: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 42: Line 42:
|Reach length directly affected=8000
|Reach length directly affected=8000
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Funding sources=HLF Bid - Biffaward secured  
|Funding sources=Biffaward secured, Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF),
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations

Latest revision as of 13:30, 1 November 2018

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 32' 49.57" N, 0° 26' 6.76" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Sarah
Main contact surname Woodcock
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


To create, restore and reconnect riverine and wetland habitat (including wet woodland, reedbed, emergent and marginal vegetation, and pond) along the River Crane. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish.

HLF Bid - Biffaward secured

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Biffaward secured, with potential for greatly increasing the scale of the project through an HLF bid. Part of River Crane Projects: 3 sites: Roxbourne Park, Yeading Brook Fields/Meadows, and Crane Park. Cost total value: £230,500; project length (m): 8000m; main funding org: Biffaward (£148,500)


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Yeading Brook (west arm)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 126126 m <br />0.126 km <br />12,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039023060



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Roxbourne Park


Site

Name Yeading Brook Fields/Meadows
WFD water body codes GB106039023060
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Yeading Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 80008,000 m <br />8 km <br />800,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Biffaward secured, Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Riparian development
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetland, Reedbed creation, Creation of pond
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information