Case study:Beddington Park: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|Project started=2008/01/01 | |Project started=2008/01/01 | ||
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€ | |Total cost category=100 - 500 k€ | ||
|Funding sources=Viridor funding, Thames Water river rehabilitation fund, Environment Agency, LIFE | |Funding sources=Viridor funding, Thames Water river rehabilitation fund, Environment Agency, European Commission (LIFE) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations |
Revision as of 12:41, 1 November 2018
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http:////www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency"http:////www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency" has been identified to contain an invalid "//www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency" authority or path component. |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, Friends of Beddington Park, London Borough of Sutton |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Objectives:
Improve water flow and quality; bank naturalisation and enhanced provisions for biodiversity; increased leisure, recreational and educational opportunities.
Methods:
Bank re-profiling using coir banks and new planting; removal of siltation to recreate single rather than two islands to enhance areas used extensively by wildlife, remove silt from lake to improve water quality and allow for the introduction of water safety training in schools, removal of toeboards, reedbed creation.
09.11.09 Next steps - approval in principle required from all those associated with proposals, detailed survey to define precise form and extent of the various parts, define programme for works execution, obtain funding. Possible constraints - quality of silt to be removed if necessary from site rather than to use in association with bank re-profiling and recreation of larger single island
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park, Medland Close, River Wandle... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|