Case study:Chambers Wharf: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=removal of jetty | |Planform / Channel pattern=removal of jetty | ||
|Other technical measure=roosting posts, Brownfield land regeneration, green roofs, SUDS, nesting boxes | |Other technical measure=roosting posts, Brownfield land regeneration, green roofs, SUDS, nesting boxes | ||
|Social measures= | |Social measures=Riverside walkway, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 08:50, 6 June 2017
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Spatial planning, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | James |
Main contact surname | Togher |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | St Martins Property Investments Ltd; |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Situated just to the east of Tower Bridge on the south bank of the River Thames, Chambers Wharf was for many years one of the capital’s major cold stores. Having fallen into disuse, the site, owned by international property development company St Martins, now has planning permission for 587 new homes; 180 of these homes will be affordable and there will be some retail units at ground level, fronting Chambers Street. Demolition of the former cold stores has been completed and the new scheme is scheduled to be finished in 2013.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Barking Creek near A13, Barking Creekmouth, Cuckolds Haven Nature Area, Greenwich Peninsula, Lower River Roding Regeneration Project, Mill Pool, Saving Chiswick Eyot, Wandsworth Riverside Quarter
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|