Case study:River Nent: Abandoned Metal Mines

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 54° 47' 51.71" N, 2° 23' 11.86" W

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E River Nent: Abandoned Metal Mines\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E In progress\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Water quality\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"River Nent: Abandoned Metal Mines","link":"","lat":54.7976965,"lon":-2.3866272,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	In progress
Project web site
Themes	Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country	England
Main contact forename	Hugh
Main contact surname	Potter
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations	The Coal Authority (UK)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) sets out a legislative framework for the analysis, planning and management of water bodies. In England it is delivered through River Basin Management Plans (RBMP), which describe waterbody conditions and objectives for their improvement.

The River Nent is ranked as the most impacted catchment in the Northumbrian River Basin District and the 2nd worst in England with respect to mine water related pollution. The River Nent waterbody is assessed in the current RBMP (2015) as failing to achieve the required WFD objective of ‘Good Potential’. For the River Nent to achieve the required objective, the levels of zinc, cadmium and lead need to be reduced, together with other measures to improve its quality.

There have been lead mines in the Nent valley since Roman times, and over 90 mine entries have been recorded throughout the area. As technology advanced in the 1700s and 1800s and longer tunnels and drainage levels could be constructed, the centres of activity became concentrated around Nenthead and Nentsberry. The Nent Force drainage Level was constructed in the 1800s and runs over 7 miles from the Nenthead mines and discharges to the River Nent at Alston. By the 1920s mining had ceased, but during the second world war spoil heaps were reworked for lead and zinc, leaving behind large tailings dams downstream of Nenthead village. In 1998 these dams were capped and stabilised by Cumbria County Council.

The history and extent of mining here has left large areas of contaminated spoil with little vegetation cover; as a result, spoil is being eroded by high rainfall and washed into the River Nent. Two sites in the catchment are listed on the MINING WASTE DIRECTIVE INVENTORY since they cause serious pollution. Many of the spoil heaps are protected as Scheduled Ancient Monuments for industrial heritage and/or Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), as the high metal levels allow rare calaminarian grasslands to flourish.

The mining industry has left a huge underground network of mine workings. The workings drain different parts of the Nent catchment and also act as a preferential pathway for groundwater to reach the surface. These drainage pathways allow the water to come into contact with the mineral veins that were mined and with mine waste stored within the mine workings. This causes the water to become rich in metals like zinc, cadmium and lead. The water from the mine workings discharges at several locations throughout the Nent valley. There are four known main discharges that contribute significant amounts of metals to the River Nent: two at Nenthead, (Caplecleugh and Rampgill adits), one at Nentsberry (Haggs adit) and the Nent Force Level at Alston.

The many inputs of metals into the River Nent cause average concentrations at Alston to exceed Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) by up to 57 times (57 times for zinc, 28 times for cadmium and 3 times for lead according to the EA catchment characterisation report). Due to this high level of pollution, very little invertebrate life can live in a 10km+ stretch of the river. The River Nent joins the River South Tyne at Alston, bringing the pollution with it and causing the River South Tyne to also fail EQS for zinc and cadmium for 60km downstream.

Investigations by Newcastle University indicate that the River Nent contributes over 50% of the total metal load (lead and zinc) reaching the South Tyne every year. Reducing the impacts from mines in the Nent valley would improve the water quality of the River Nent and all of the downstream waterbodies, and would be a significant step in achieving EQS in the South Tyne.

The Environment Agency has teamed up with other partners to look at ways to reduce the polluting effects of the mines on the River Nent, with funding from Defra. We're working with the Coal Authority and the North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty partnership (AONB) to find ways of removing metals from mine water discharges at three of the four main discharges. We're also working with the Tyne Rivers Trust on ways to reduce the amount of metal-rich sediments that get washed into the river – for example willow planting. Without any action, these mines will continue to pollute the Rivers Nent and South Tyne for centuries to come.

There are so many point and diffuse sources of zinc, cadmium and lead in the area that we're unlikely to be able to achieve EQS in the River Nent itself. However, we hope to be able to significantly improve water quality and therefore achieve good status in around 60 km of the River South Tyne. Other benefits of tackling these sources of pollution include improving habitats for aquatic life, increasing biodiversity and protecting Scheduled Ancient Monuments.

Treatment schemes will be required to clean up all these discharges and the spoil heaps, and we’re investigating the best ways of doing this. We expect the first scheme will be to treat the Haggs discharge. The treatment scheme is being designed to remove at least 90% of zinc and cadmium from the mine water – making a significant improvement to water quality in the Nent at Alston and also the South Tyne.

What technology is available?

One treatment technology that is available is a Vertical Flow Pond (VFP) and a wetland, similar to the scheme at Force Crag mine in Cumbria, the first treatment scheme of its type in the UK. The shape and size of the Nent schemes will be different, and is likely to look like a series of large ponds, along with a wetland containing reeds and other plants.

The VFPs work by using a combination of compost, limestone and woodchip to encourage microbial activity to bind the dissolved metals as sulphides, trapping them in the compost mixture. The water is then passed through a wetland to re-oxygenate the water before finally being discharged to the River Nent.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.

Significant water quality monitoring of the River Nent and the point source discharges from the abandoned metal mines has been carried out by the Environment Agency in recent years. The water quality results from 3 of the main discharges are summarised below. As the concentrations of metals and rate of flow is variable in discharges like these, the figures below are presented as minimum to maximum ranges taken from the EA catchment characterisation report.

Caplecleugh • Zinc:2700 - 8810 kg/yr • Lead: 0 – 10 kg/yr • Cadmium: 0 - 10 kg/yr

Rampgill • Zinc: 170 - 400 kg/yr • Lead: 0 – 2kg/yr • Cadmium: 0.24 - 0.76 kg/yr

Haggs • Zinc: 2000 – 5100 kg/yr • Lead: 0 – 1 kg/yr • Cadmium: 2 – 3.3 kg/yr

River Nent at Alston • Zinc: 2300 - 35000 kg/yr • Lead: 20 – 600 kg/yr • Cadmium: 10 - 90 kg /yr

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Vertical Flow Pond diagram

Catchment and subcatchment Select a catchment/subcatchment Edit the catchment and subcatchment details (affects all case studies in this subcatchment) Catchment River basin district Northumbria River basin Tyne Subcatchment River name Nent from Source to South Tyne Area category 10 - 100 km² Area (km2) Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m Maximum altitude (m) 672672 m <br />0.672 km <br />67,200 cm <br /> Dominant geology Siliceous Ecoregion Great Britain Dominant land cover Acid Grassland Waterbody ID GB103023075420 Site Edit site Name WFD water body codes GB103023075420 WFD (national) typology WFD water body name Nent from Source to South Tyne Pre-project morphology Reference morphology Desired post project morphology Heavily modified water body No National/international site designation Local/regional site designations Protected species present No Invasive species present No Species of interest Dominant hydrology Dominant substrate River corridor land use Average bankfull channel width category Average bankfull channel width (m) Average bankfull channel depth category Average bankfull channel depth (m) Mean discharge category Mean annual discharge (m3/s) Average channel gradient category Average channel gradient Average unit stream power (W/m2) Project background Edit project background Reach length directly affected (m) Project started Works started Works completed Project completed Total cost category Total cost (k€) Benefit to cost ratio Funding sources Cost for project phases Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname Investigation and design Stakeholder engagement and communication Works and works supervision Post-project management and maintenance Monitoring Reasons for river restoration Edit reasons for restoration Mitigation of a pressure Hydromorphology Biology Physico-chemical Other reasons for the project Measures Edit Measures Structural measures Bank/bed modifications Floodplain / River corridor Planform / Channel pattern Other Non-structural measures Management interventions Social measures (incl. engagement) Other Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description http://http://apps.environment-agency.gov.uk/wiyby/139297.aspx Details of sites listed in the Mining Waste Directive Inventory http://https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/map-search?clearresults=True Find out more about Scheduled Ancient Monuments http://http://magic.defra.gov.uk/MagicMap.aspx?startTopic=Designations&activelayer=sssiIndex&query=HYPERLINK%3D%271005625%27 Find out more about Designated sites http://https://www2.groundstability.com/force-crag-mine-water-treatment-scheme/ Force Crag Mine Water Treatment scheme http://https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/the-coal-authority The Coal Authority Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information