Case study:Emmanuel’s Common Reconnection Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|Project completed=2014/11/14 | |Project completed=2014/11/14 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Reconnect old channel, improve flow regime, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Improve fish habitat and biodiversity | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 11:32, 25 October 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Helen |
Main contact surname | Mandley |
Main contact user ID | User:JoshRRC |
Contact organisation | Norfolk Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.norfolkriverstrust.org/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The River Nar has been historically modified for human use, changing its channel size and shape, and in places the river’s course. These changes have negatively impacted on the wildlife of the river. The River Nar through Emmanuel’s Common has historically been used for water meadows to graze animals. The river has been deepened and straightened to enable drainage of the site and to increase water flow to power Newton Mill. By looking at historic maps and investigating on the ground you can see the old meandering channel through the woodland.
The project within the common has now been completed. We have delivered the restoration scheme as planned where we wanted to reconnect 600m of old channel constructing one new length of channel to make the meander sequence link up.
The project aims to reconnect the old meandering channel, open up some of the channel by removing scrub to allow light in, improve flow regime, improve fish & invertebrate habitat, and improve aquatic and riparian plant habitat.
Monitoring surveys and results
Please use the link to find out about the Electrofishing surveys for the project http://www.norfolkriverstrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Electrofishing-doc.pdf
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Pentney Restoration Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|