Case study:East Mascalls Fish Pass: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site}} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Biological quality elements=Provide a fish pass for wildlife | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 13:34, 24 October 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Peter |
Main contact surname | King |
Main contact user ID | User:Oartpk |
Contact organisation | Ouse & Adur Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.oart.org.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project has seen the pre-fabrication, in HDPE plastic, of a larinier style fish pass which has been installed at one of the thirteen highlighted priority sites for fish passage improvements on the River Ouse in Sussex. Having attempted a "traditional" in-channel construction of the pass in 2012 and 2013 a new approach was needed to overcome constraints on the temporary works detail, the time it would take to install and the general methodology.
Using expertise from Sussex, Suffolk and Holland the pass was designed and delivered so it could be bolted together on site before being lifted into place and bolted down in a day. This approach eliminated the previous constraints and enabled a cost effective solution to be implemented with minimum disruption to the local angling club.
Monitoring surveys and results
An upstream monitoring point is established and will be re-sampled in 2017 and compared to previous results with details posted online.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|