Case study:Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected=100 m | |Reach length directly affected=100 m | ||
|Project started=2011/ | |Project started=2011/05/01 | ||
|Funding sources=Environment Agency: Flood and coastal risk management | |Funding sources=Environment Agency: Flood and coastal risk management | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 08:43, 20 October 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Dave |
Main contact surname | Webb |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Planned objectives:
• Potential to improve conveyance and reduce sedimentation and improve the ecology of the Beverley Brook.
• Potential to undertake river restoration in areas where the Beverley Brook has previously been re-sectioned or modified, and where it currently flows through areas of open space.
• Potential to remove areas of old or redundant bank protection/structures and re-naturalise the channel banks.
• Potential to undertake habitat creation or enhancement works.
Objectives carried out (2012):
Flood and coastal risk management scheme to repair tidal sluice incorporating fish pass and reedbed.
At the lower section of Beverley Brook the flow is diverted into a series of culvert which outfall into the Thames and only 20% of the flow continues down the main channel. As a result the flows are low and there is a lot of siltation and lack of inchannel processes. Drivers: Biodiversity Action Plan, Water Framework Directive.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook Flow control structures, Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane, Beverley Park, Cuddington Park, Horne Way Weir... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|