Case study:Osterley Weir, Hanwell eel pass: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
|Contact organisation=Thames Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation=Thames Rivers Trust
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Osterley eel pass replacement Jan 2015.JPG
|Project summary=Develop a better entrance way into the park linked to the River Shuttle walk, including new bridge over the river itself<br>Enhance river marginal plant diversity<br>Improve the woodland management<br>Provide new play equipment for children<br>Wetland creation The River Shuttle runs in a straightened channel through Parish Wood Park, a small park on the Bexley/Greenwich border. The river has good form but has a monoculture marginal plant community. A new wetland will provide a new type of habitat for the Shuttle corridor.
|Project summary=Develop a better entrance way into the park linked to the River Shuttle walk, including new bridge over the river itself<br>Enhance river marginal plant diversity<br>Improve the woodland management<br>Provide new play equipment for children<br>Wetland creation The River Shuttle runs in a straightened channel through Parish Wood Park, a small park on the Bexley/Greenwich border. The river has good form but has a monoculture marginal plant community. A new wetland will provide a new type of habitat for the Shuttle corridor.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Post-project Appraisal
|Monitoring surveys and results=Post-project Appraisal

Revision as of 08:44, 22 June 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 29' 51.21" N, 0° 19' 58.90" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries
Country England
Main contact forename Chris
Main contact surname Cockel
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Thames Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Develop a better entrance way into the park linked to the River Shuttle walk, including new bridge over the river itself
Enhance river marginal plant diversity
Improve the woodland management
Provide new play equipment for children
Wetland creation The River Shuttle runs in a straightened channel through Parish Wood Park, a small park on the Bexley/Greenwich border. The river has good form but has a monoculture marginal plant community. A new wetland will provide a new type of habitat for the Shuttle corridor.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Post-project Appraisal

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Pass is made from GRP, due to theft risk in an open urban area. Lower section of pass was broken off, probably by a large log, meaning the pass is not functioning at present (August 2013).


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Brent (below Silk stream down to the Thames)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 130130 m <br />0.13 km <br />13,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039023590



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Boston Manor, Brent Lodge Park Improvement, Brent River Park Phase II, Clitherow's Island, Brentford eel pass, Stonebridge Estate, Stoney Sluice, Brentford eel pass, Thames Lock Weir, Brentford eel pass


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039023590
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Brent (below Silk stream down to the Thames)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 5 m0.005 km <br />500 cm <br />
Project started 2012/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2012/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category 1 - 10 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources DEFRA through River Improvement Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Weir improvement
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information