Case study:Sheephouse Wood Mine Water Treatment Scheme: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Coal mine water pollution
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Coal mine water pollution
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Floodplain / River corridor=Reedbed creation, Creation of two infiltration lagoons,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Revision as of 10:27, 8 June 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 29' 53.54" N, 1° 39' 10.73" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Sinead
Main contact surname Chamberlain
Main contact user ID User:Coal Authority
Contact organisation The Coal Authority (UK)
Contact organisation web site http://coal.decc.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Don and Rother

Subcatchment

River name Little Don from Source to River Don
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m) 539539 m <br />0.539 km <br />53,900 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Bog
Waterbody ID GB104027057460



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Little Don Catchment Case Study


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB104027057460
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Little Don from Source to River Don
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical Coal mine water pollution
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Reedbed creation, Creation of two infiltration lagoons
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information