Case study:Lower Darwen Weir Removal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=53.71070469236263, -2.473509516566992 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Lower Darwen Weir Removal |Status...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Hydromorphology | |Themes=Fisheries, Hydromorphology | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
|Contact organisation=Ribble Rivers Trust | |Contact organisation=Ribble Rivers Trust | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.ribbletrust.org.uk | |Contact organisation url=www.ribbletrust.org.uk | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Connecting People and Rivers | |||
|Multi-site=Yes | |Multi-site=Yes | ||
| | |Project picture=Before and After.jpg | ||
|Project summary=Weir Removal to improve fish passage and Hydromorphology of a Heavily Modified Water Body in an Urban Area | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=100% successful fish passage has been achieved | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} |
Revision as of 17:55, 23 May 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 53° 42' 38.54" N, 2° 28' 24.63" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Jack |
Main contact surname | Spees |
Main contact user ID | User:RRT |
Contact organisation | Ribble Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.ribbletrust.org.uk |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Weir Removal to improve fish passage and Hydromorphology of a Heavily Modified Water Body in an Urban Area
Monitoring surveys and results
Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.
100% successful fish passage has been achieved
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|