Case study:River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 1: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Planned
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Dave
|Main contact forename=Bella
|Main contact surname=Bartlett
|Main contact surname=Davies
|Partner organisations=Wandle Trust, Wild Trout Trust, Sutton County Council
|Contact organisation=Wandle Trust
|Contact organisation url=www.wandletrust.org
|Partner organisations=Wandle Trust, Wild Trout Trust, Sutton County Council, Environment Agency,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=Reduction in height of three weirs and habitat creation in preparation for the reintroduction of a population of Wandle Trout. Fish pass on Butterhill Mill. In-stream diversity, weir adjustment and habitat connectivity. Fish pass on large weir sluice. Failing WFD for fish pass due to impassible nature of the river, and the prime trout habitat in the area is currently inaccessible. A lack of native trout and suitable connected habitat. Designing for low flow and climate change. Previously deculverted and restored stretch of the Wandle ecologically isolated by the weir at Butter Hill Mill.<br>
|Project summary=This was the first phase in the larger River Wandle Restoration Project with the overall aim to establish a population of brown trout in the Carshalton arm of the River Wandle for the first time in over 80 years.
Possible constraints - Historic structures and urban environment<br>
 
Next steps - Fish pass design to be confirmed, dates for volunteers to complete in-stream restoration. One weir still to reduce in height; Larinier fish pass needing adjustments
The overall objective of this larger project was to rehabilitate the Carshalton waterbody by improving habitat diversity and quality, fish passage, hydromorphology and water quality; with wild trout used as the indicator species for the river’s recovery.  
 
 
In 2010, the gradual lowering of 3 the three stabilising weirs was undertaken in partnership with the EA to improve both fish passage and flow regime. The EA also installed a Larinier Fish Pass on a large weir at Butter Hill Bridge but due to unforeseen site restrictions the pass was ineffective without modification.
 
To compliment this work, the Wild Trout Trust (WTT) led a Practical Visit to enhance in-channel habitat and train Wandle Trust staff and 50 volunteers from the local community and TITT projects from around the country in river enhancement techniques. Large Woody Debris (LWD) was installed to produce good quality habitat for trout at all life stages: scoured spawning gravels, holding lies for adult trout and cover suitable for juvenile life stages of trout.  
|Monitoring surveys and results=Please see the parent project (River Wandle Restoration Project) for the final results on this work, combined with the other phases.  
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}

Revision as of 12:22, 9 February 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 22' 13.42" N, 0° 9' 35.44" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Bella
Main contact surname Davies
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wandle Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wandletrust.org
Partner organisations Wandle Trust, Wild Trout Trust, Sutton County Council, Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This was the first phase in the larger River Wandle Restoration Project with the overall aim to establish a population of brown trout in the Carshalton arm of the River Wandle for the first time in over 80 years.

The overall objective of this larger project was to rehabilitate the Carshalton waterbody by improving habitat diversity and quality, fish passage, hydromorphology and water quality; with wild trout used as the indicator species for the river’s recovery.


In 2010, the gradual lowering of 3 the three stabilising weirs was undertaken in partnership with the EA to improve both fish passage and flow regime. The EA also installed a Larinier Fish Pass on a large weir at Butter Hill Bridge but due to unforeseen site restrictions the pass was ineffective without modification.

To compliment this work, the Wild Trout Trust (WTT) led a Practical Visit to enhance in-channel habitat and train Wandle Trust staff and 50 volunteers from the local community and TITT projects from around the country in river enhancement techniques. Large Woody Debris (LWD) was installed to produce good quality habitat for trout at all life stages: scoured spawning gravels, holding lies for adult trout and cover suitable for juvenile life stages of trout.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Please see the parent project (River Wandle Restoration Project) for the final results on this work, combined with the other phases.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Wandle (Carshalton Branch at Carshalton)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 160160 m <br />0.16 km <br />16,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039017640



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Butter Hill Phase 2, River Wandle Restoration Project, River Wandle: Silt & SuDs, Wandle River Restoration Project: Hackbridge


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039017640
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Wandle (Carshalton Branch at Carshalton)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 360 m0.36 km <br />36,000 cm <br />
Project started 2009/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency, Thames Water Wandle River Restoration Fund, DEFRA

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Weir improvement
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Installation of fish pass
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information