Case study:River Tat Restoration Scheme: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|Subcatchment=Tat | |Subcatchment=Tat | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB105034051140 | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2013/05/01 | |Project started=2013/05/01 |
Revision as of 13:36, 1 September 2015
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Adam |
Main contact surname | Thurtle |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Water Management Alliance, Natural England, Atkins, Pynkney Hall Estate |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The River Tat is a tributary of the River Wensum and forms part of the River Wensum Site of Special Scientific Interest. The planform and channel geometry has historically been subjected to significant modification including diversions, straightening, widening and the construction of an online lake system. The aim of the restoration work was to ‘kick start’ natural morphological processes throughout the reach.
A design report was written for the site which outlined the range of restoration measures that could be used. However, the design was extremely flexible and the location of different features was determined by a combination of expert judgement and working with existing channel features. On the ground works were delivered by an experienced Environment Agency Field Services team who have become skilled at delivering this type of restoration work.
In locations where a gravel bed was present, albeit beneath a layer of sand/silt because of the homogeneous character of the water course, gravel glides have been restored by re-distributing the bed material to form glide-pool sequences. The water velocity has been increased by narrowing the channel, using features such as earth berms and woody debris, resulting in a clean gravel bed. Deep pools have been dug to introduce variations in bed levels, providing flow diversity and creating resting areas for fish.
A key restoration measure has been the installation of Large Woody Debris (LWD). Reducing tree cover in heavily shaded areas, by selective coppicing, provides a sustainable source of material. This also allows light onto the river, promoting marginal vegetation to establish. LWD has introduced flow diversity, helping keep the gravels free from silt and providing overhead cover for fish.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|