Case study:Little Waltham Meadows Back Channel creation: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:
{{Case study image
{{Case study image
|File name=IMG 20140723 122117.jpg
|File name=IMG 20140723 122117.jpg
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Little Waltham After.jpg
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Work begins on the Back channel.jpg
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=The back channel comes together.jpg
}}
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}

Revision as of 13:59, 27 April 2015

5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 46' 26.36" N, 0° 28' 50.59" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Kieren
Main contact surname Alexander
Main contact user ID User:KierenAlexander
Contact organisation Essex Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.essexwt.org.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This is a multi-benefit project aimed at improving in channel morphological diversity, reducing the amount of diffuse pollution and sedimentation entering the main river Chelmer. It will also increase the amount of riparian habitat along the River Chelmer and enhance the resilience of the wet woodland.

This project was funded by the Catchment restoration fund, as part of the Essex Healthy headwaters scheme. The earthworks were undertaken in late Summer, early Autumn 2014.

This aims of this project were achieved in the first instance by the creation of a new 280 backwater channel with three settling ponds and a sluice structure. The back channel connects with the river and an existing culvert/drainage point off the nearby main road. The ponds and back channel in the first instance allow for any nitrate and phosphate heavy water coming through the culvert to be settled and filtered. The back channel is also excellent in times of high flows at providing fish refuges, especially for fish fry which are in danger of being washed downstream in flood events. It will also provide an interface between the river and the bank side which will allow some interesting and diverse flora to develop. Finally, by connecting the river with the floodplain it creates additional riparian habitat and has a small but meaningful impact on flooding by increasing storage in the floodplain, outside of Chelmsford.

The other aim of the project, namely to increase the resilience of the wet woodland. Was created by installing a sluice at the far end of an existing ditch. Unlike the other sluice this captures rain water and holds it back on the landward side, this has been set at a level that is higher than previous levels and will effect a raise in water off approximately 50 centimeters. The increased water levels have also allowed for additional planting to be undertaken that will extend the water by over half a hectare, there has also been some limited earthworks to spread the water over a wider area.

These works will keep the woodland wetter in the summer months, keeping Bramble under control and allowing a further establishment of the flora normally associated with wet woodlands.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


There has been a full pre-works survey conducted by Essex Ecological Consultancy service which has established a baseline index of key invertebrates and flora.

Post works it is hoped that this survey can repeated once the site has settled down to allow an accurate summary of the effect of the works. There will also be adhoc surveys of any flora development in time.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The sluice at the Wet woodland presented some issues post project, with an unacceptable level of water loss through the frame. This was rectified and is now operating at a normal level. However, some thought must be given to the purpose of the sluice and this should inform the design of the sluice. Holding water back requires a strong but not particularly flexible structure.

Any back channel is relies heavily on the correct levels being established, this relies on understanding the local conditions i.e. any local impoundments this may not be easily recognized so early and often discussions with the EA or the local Drainage board are necessary.


Image gallery


IMG 20140925 114123.jpg
IMG 20140723 122117.jpg
Little Waltham After.jpg
Work begins on the Back channel.jpg
The back channel comes together.jpg
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Combined Essex

Subcatchment

River name Chelmer (Upper)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 124124 m <br />0.124 km <br />12,400 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105037041200



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 400400 m <br />0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Project started 2012/10/01
Works started 2014/09/22
Works completed 2014/11/21
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Essex Wildlife Trust Kieren Alexander
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Reduce diffuse pollution
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Biodiversity, Landscape enhancement, flood alleviation


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications New sluice structures
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of backwaters, Creation of wet woodland, Riparian enhancement
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Local volunteers planted the trees and learnt about Natural Flood Management
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information