Case study:Bocking Blackwater River Restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Blackwater Pant
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=Bocking Blackwater LNR
|Name=Bocking Blackwater LNR

Revision as of 16:37, 17 November 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 53' 8.66" N, 0° 33' 37.43" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes
Country England
Main contact forename Kieren
Main contact surname Alexander
Main contact user ID User:KierenAlexander
Contact organisation Essex Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.essexwt.org.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Currently, the River Blackwater (Pant, upstream) is classed under the WFD framework as heavily modified with poor potential. It is this assessment that drives the restoration project. This project is funded by the Environment Agencies Catchment Restoration fund and is part of the Essex Healthy headwaters scheme. Physical earthworks are due to commence in Winter 2014/15

The main aspect of this project is to repair river banks to reduce erosion, poaching and silt inputs, the second is to improve riparian habitat and floristic diversity.

The river banks will be restored using a mixture of bio engineering schemes including Coir roles, willow spiling and bank re-profiling. This will introduce floristic diversity, establish emergent vegetation, decrease silt input from the eroding banks and reduce the poaching effect from dog walkers.

All the above should add up to the an overall improvement of the local Riverine habitat and an improvement in the general water qaulity and hydro morphological condition of the river.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Fixed point photography will be used to monitor physical changes both post and pre work. In addition a baseline survey of macrophytes, invertebrates and water quality surveys – data gathered will include – turbidity, sediment, Ammonia/Dissolved Oxygen/Phosphate using field phosphate sampling equipment. This project site will be resurveyed against baseline at the conclusion of the project in 2015.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Combined Essex

Subcatchment

River name Blackwater Pant
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 6868 m <br />0.068 km <br />6,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105037033860



Site

Name Bocking Blackwater LNR
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information