Case study:Woughton on the Green bank stabilization: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Park's Trust
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Park's Trust
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=IMG 4832.JPG
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 13:48, 17 October 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 2' 8.88" N, 0° 43' 8.22" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Clapham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Milton Keynes Park's Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Woughton on the Green
WFD water body codes GB105033037971
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 3030 m <br />0.03 km <br />3,000 cm <br />
Project started 2014/09/09
Works started 2014/10/09
Works completed 2014/10/10
Project completed
Total cost category Less than 1 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Stakeholder engagement and communication Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Works and works supervision Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Post-project management and maintenance Less than 1 k€ Milton Keynes Park's Trust Rob Rieke
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Substrate conditions
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Prevent loss of adjacent footpath due to bank collapse


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information