Case study:Pipeline and WFD Project 2: Difference between revisions
Eldridge123 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Eldridge123 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site}} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=habitat degradation | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 08:37, 17 September 2014
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/pipeline.php |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality |
Country | England, Wales |
Main contact forename | Stephen |
Main contact surname | Marsh-Smith |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Wye & Usk Foundation |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/ |
Partner organisations | Monnow Fisheries Association |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Foundation was very fortunate to secure funding at a time when our substantial ERDF projects had been completed. This enabled the momentum of our habitat restoration to continue. The National Grid Enhancement Fund (christened the "Pipeline Project") and The Water Framework Directive Fund both made substantial contributions towards river restoration. For the first time, we engaged with the Monnow Fisheries Association to undertake habitat restoration in parts of the Monnow catchment.
Both these projects enabled us to target areas across the catchments that were in most urgent need of restoration. Both finished in 2009 and we attach detailed reports of actions taken as two PDFs:
http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/WUF-Report-on-National-Grid-Enhancement-Projects-2009.pdf
http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/WUF-Report-WFD-2009.pdf
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|