Case study:Water Framework Directive Funding: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration,  
|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration,  
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of fish barriers,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Revision as of 16:10, 16 September 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/waterframework.php
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country England, Wales
Main contact forename Stephen
Main contact surname Marsh-Smith
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wye & Usk Foundation
Contact organisation web site http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/
Partner organisations The Association of Rivers Trusts, Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Kington - Arrowmills

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The advent of the proactive stage of the Water Framework Directive has allowed some funding to be channelled to the Wye through two sources:

• The Association of Rivers Trusts

• Environment Agency


This aim of the funding is to improve failing water bodies, for example: those where fish are prevented from accessing; those with habitat issues and those suffering from diffuse pollution.

WUF completed three WFD funded projects and assisted with a fourth in partnership with the Monnow Fisheries Association.


The Arrow Access Project

This takes forward the work done in Leader + to secure access for salmon and trout to the middle and upper reaches of the river. There were four fish passes built in 2010.


River Garren Access Project

In 2010, we started creating fish access on the Garren which enters the Wye near Goodrich. In that yea blocked the river, the lowering of another and easement of two other potential obstacles.


The third WFD funded project report may be viewed by accessing http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/Report-for-EA-of-WFD-Project.pdf. The final WFD project is still progressing and details will be posted when complete.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Removal of fish barriers
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information