Case study:Eastridge Estate restoration project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site}} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Poor river connectivity | |||
|Biological quality elements=Barriers to fish migration | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 11:45, 20 August 2014
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 25' 59.06" N, 1° 32' 51.71" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joshua |
Main contact surname | Robins |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Eastridge Estate and Windrush AEC Ltd |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | River Restoration Centre |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The River Kennet was the subject of many overviews by the Environment Agency and Natural England. These overviews revealed that the Kennet was in an unfavourable condition. Problems included barriers to fish migration and poor water quality. The measures used to combat these issues included the introduction of 3,000 tonnes of gravel, the creation of fish and ell passes and the protection of vulnerable banks.
The project appears to have been a success with many of the objectives been achieved.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|