Case study:Millfield Plantation 2: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location}} {{Project overview |Project title=Millfield Plantation |Status=In progress |Country=England |Main contact forename=K...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Location}}
{{Location}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Millfield Plantation
|Status=In progress
|Status=In progress
|Country=England
|Country=England
Line 12: Line 11:
|Contact organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Contact organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Contact organisation url=http://www.essexrivershub.org.uk/
|Contact organisation url=http://www.essexrivershub.org.uk/
|Name of parent multi-site project=Essex healthy headwaters
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Essex healthy headwaters
|Project summary=The River pant in this location has undergone a high degree of physical modification and has limited or no connectivity with the floodplain on either bank. As such the project proposes to reconnect the surrounding meadows, creating a secondary channel and some wet grassland.
 
To do this it is proposed that a 300mm pipe is installed approximately at a height that will allow regular inundation, especially during high rainfall events and will facilitate the creation of the back channel.
 
The back channel will then be further enhanced by limited excavation and pool creation to form bays and hold water during periods of drought.
 
 
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 15:25, 15 July 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes
Country England
Main contact forename Kieren
Main contact surname Alexander
Main contact user ID User:KierenAlexander
Contact organisation Essex Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.essexrivershub.org.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Essex healthy headwaters

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River pant in this location has undergone a high degree of physical modification and has limited or no connectivity with the floodplain on either bank. As such the project proposes to reconnect the surrounding meadows, creating a secondary channel and some wet grassland.

To do this it is proposed that a 300mm pipe is installed approximately at a height that will allow regular inundation, especially during high rainfall events and will facilitate the creation of the back channel.

The back channel will then be further enhanced by limited excavation and pool creation to form bays and hold water during periods of drought.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information