Case study:Limestone Ribble Restoration Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
|File name=CRF022 Project Briefing Note - Limestone Ribble.pdf
|Description=CRF Project briefing note - Limestone Ribble
}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}

Revision as of 14:11, 25 April 2014

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 44' 46.59" N, 2° 48' 49.94" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename John
Main contact surname Milne
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Ribble Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.ribbletrust.org.uk
Partner organisations Yorkshire Dales Millennium Trust, Yorkshire Dales National Park, Settle Anglers Association, Wild Trout Trust, Woodland Trust, Durham University, Halton West Estate
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Limestone Ribble Restoration is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to improve watercourses in an area of the Ribble Catchment that has been quarried, farmed and industrialised for hundreds of years. The degraded habitat, diffuse pollution and obstructions to fish passage are causing certain watercourses in this area to fail to meet the required standards under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Through restoration work, the project will address issues including: unnatural flow regimes caused by upland grips; sediment which has a direct adverse effect on water quality; barriers to fish migration, preventing fish from reaching habitat that modelling shows they should be present in; interrupted natural downstream movement of substrate which reduces spawning habitat for salmonids; fertiliser run off into rivers which can cause nutrient enrichment and impact negatively on river ecology; expected rise in river water temperature associated with climate change; failed bathing water standard in coastal reaches due to presence of excess pathogens attributable to upstream sources.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Ribble
River basin

Subcatchment

River name River Ribble
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Padiham Traditional Boundaries (Pendle Hill), Ribble Tributrees


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 100100 k€ <br />100,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Less than 1 k€
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Diffuse polution
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Tree planting
Floodplain / River corridor Removal of barriers, The blocking of certain grips
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information