Case study:Mill Road Weir: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 87: Line 87:
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration
   
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow, Substrate conditions, Width & depth variation
   
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Invertebrates, Macrophytes
     
|Biological quality elements=
     
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
     
|Specific mitigation=
     
|Other motivation=
     
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures

Revision as of 11:27, 25 April 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 26' 35.67" N, 0° 21' 25.84" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Melanie
Main contact surname Challis
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations London Borough of Richmond, FORCE: Friends of the River Crane Environment
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Removal or modification of Mill Road Weir, in conjunction with the weir on the associated side loop, to improve flows both on the main channel and side loop which could improve a significant length of river. Benefit in terms of fish passage. Improvement in flow for the benefit of aquatic plants such as ranunculus, and to allow
for scour of gravels for the benefit of fish and invertebrates.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Crane (including part of the Yeading Brook)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 5151 m <br />0.051 km <br />5,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039023030



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Big Yellow, Crane Park, Cranford Park Phase 2, Hospital Bridge Road, Re-connecting Meanders at Cranebank on the River Crane, The Mid River Crane - Aquatic Refuge Identification Plan


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources FRM Capital Budget

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Substrate conditions, Width & depth variation
Biology Fish, Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information