Case study:Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=RIBBLE
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site

Revision as of 13:45, 22 April 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 54' 39.38" N, 2° 21' 45.15" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes
Country England
Main contact forename Jack
Main contact surname Spees
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Ribble Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Diffusing the Issue in Rural Ribble - River Loud, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Easington, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Skirden Beck, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Stock Beck, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Swanside
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district North West
River basin Ribble

Subcatchment

River name RIBBLE
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID GB531207112400



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Long Preston Deeps Flood Plain Project, Ribble Life Together


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident, Riparian development, Barriers to fish migration, Impoundments (not hydropower)
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Channel pattern/planform
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank reprofiling, Reduce diffuse pollution
Floodplain / River corridor Weir/barrier removing, Large scale fish easement installation, Small scale easement installation, Tree plantation
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information