Case study:Platt Brook Restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
{{Case study image
|File name=Platt brook before.jpg
|File name=Platt Brook before.jpg
|Caption=Platt Brook before restoration
|Caption=Platt Brook before restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Platt Brook bed Before.jpg
|Caption=Platt Brook bed before restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Platt Brook bed after.jpg
|Caption=Platt Brook bed after restoration
}}
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}

Revision as of 21:14, 20 March 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.50
(2 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 28' 4.18" N, 1° 46' 18.44" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.bbcwildlife.org.uk/nia/projects/platt-brook-restoration-project
Themes Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Will
Main contact surname Groves
Main contact user ID User:Wgroves
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations Birmingham City Council, Environment Agency, Birmingham and Black Country NIA
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The project aims were to improve the aesthetics, water quality and biodiversity of the Platt Brook in Sheldon, Birmingham. The focus of the project was a section of the brook flowing through public land surrounded by high density housing.

Before the project, the brook was much neglected and suffered from silt build up, flytipping and pollution from misconnections and other sewer misuse.

During the restoration works silt was removed and its banks were pulled back to recreate a more natural river channel. It is hoped that the scheme will help the brook to self-cleanse and re-oxygenate, providing much needed urban habitat for wildlife and making the brook more accessible for people.

The project was delivered in 2013.

Since the end of the project the brook has been adopted by a community based WatersideCare group - http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/watersidecare/689

This project was delivered by the Birmingham Brooks Partnership and is a sister project to the Short Heath Brook project - http://restorerivers.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Case_study%3AShort_Heath_Brook_Project

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


File:Platt Brook before.jpg
Platt Brook before restoration
Platt Brook bed before restoration
Platt Brook bed after restoration
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information