Case study:Day Brook Restoration - Gedling: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Before.JPG
|Caption=Day Brook before
}}
{{Case study image
{{Case study image
|File name=Before 2.JPG
|File name=Before 2.JPG
Line 46: Line 42:
|Caption=Day Brook construction
|Caption=Day Brook construction
}}
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}

Revision as of 02:33, 19 March 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.50
(2 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 59' 38.90" N, 1° 8' 15.42" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename John
Main contact surname Brewington
Main contact user ID User:John Brewington
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations Groundwork Greater Nottingham, Environment Agency, Nottinghamshire County Council, Gedling Borough Council
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project is restoring natural features to a section of the Day Brook as it flows through a small park on the outskirts of Nottingham city.

The brook is being moved from the existing heavily modified and shaded channel into a more natural course. Brook length has been increased with the introduction of a meanders along with shallower, soft banks and variation in flow and bed conditions.

With the material produced from the channel excavations, a shallow bund has been constructed to retain flood waters within the park in order to help reduce flooding of downstream properties.

In an effort to raise awareness of the watercourse and to create a more attractive park environment, 2 new bridges will take an existing path over the new brook channel.

This part of the brook is one of the few sections not within a culvert as it flows through Gedling Borough. Beyond this section the brook continues to flow within a heavily modified channel and the entire length is subject to pollution from diffuse, urban sources.

This project is a sister project to the Day Brook rain gardens - http://restorerivers.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Case_study%3ADay_Brook_Rain_Gardens

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Day Brook before
Day Brook before
Day Brook construction


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information