Case study:SMURF Tame: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.51465798271728, -1.8911759555339813 }} {{Project overview |Project title=SMURF Tame |Status=Complete |Cou...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=SMURF Tame
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Mark
|Main contact forename=Mark
Line 13: Line 13:
|Contact organisation=The Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=The Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk/
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk/
|Partner organisations=Birmingham City Council, United Kingdom, H R Wallingford, United Kingdom, Severn Trent Water, United Kingdom, Staatliches Umweltamt Herten, Germany
|Multi-site=Yes
|Multi-site=Yes
|Project picture=River Tame in Perry Hall.jpg
|Picture description=River Tame in Perry Hall playing fields, after scheme.
|Project summary=Sustainable Management of Urban Rivers and Floodplains (SMURF) project shows that small-scale changes can make a significant improvement to urban rivers and floodplains. Two small river improvement schemes were undertaken on the river Tame. One in Perry Hall playing fields and one at Salford Park. The first one contains widening a section of river channel, reshaping of river-banks and creation of a low-level riverside terrace. The second site contains only the planting of marginal and riverside vegetation.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 09:53, 27 February 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 30' 52.77" N, 1° 53' 28.23" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Mark
Main contact surname Scott
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/
Partner organisations Birmingham City Council, United Kingdom, H R Wallingford, United Kingdom, Severn Trent Water, United Kingdom, Staatliches Umweltamt Herten, Germany
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
River Tame at Salford Park ("SMURF"), River Tame in Perry Hall playing fields ("SMURF")
River Tame in Perry Hall playing fields, after scheme.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Sustainable Management of Urban Rivers and Floodplains (SMURF) project shows that small-scale changes can make a significant improvement to urban rivers and floodplains. Two small river improvement schemes were undertaken on the river Tame. One in Perry Hall playing fields and one at Salford Park. The first one contains widening a section of river channel, reshaping of river-banks and creation of a low-level riverside terrace. The second site contains only the planting of marginal and riverside vegetation.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information