Case study:Short Heath Brook Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 93: Line 93:
{{Case study image
{{Case study image
|File name=Full Spate 070612.jpg
|File name=Full Spate 070612.jpg
|Caption=Short Heath Brook, post project during wet weather
|Caption= Post project during wet weather
}}
}}
{{Case study image
{{Case study image

Revision as of 09:15, 23 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 31' 44.13" N, 1° 51' 9.35" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Will
Main contact surname Groves
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations Birmingham City Council/ Witton Lodge Community Assoication/ Friends of Witton Lakes
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Bleak Hill Recreation Ground
WFD water body codes GB104028046840
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name River Tame from Conf of the two arms to R Blythe
Pre-project morphology Straightened, Artificial channel
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Silt
River corridor land use Parklands garden
Average bankfull channel width category Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category Less than 0.5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br />
Project started 2011/10/28
Works started 2011/11/01
Works completed 2012/02/17
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) 126587126,587 k€ <br />126,587,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Section 106 (planning gain) and Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 5000 - 10000 k€ 1000010,000 k€ <br />10,000,000 € <br /> Birmingham City Council/ Environment Agency Will Groves
Stakeholder engagement and communication Less than 1 k€ Birmingham City Council Chris Baker
Works and works supervision more than 10000 k€ 126587126,587 k€ <br />126,587,000 € <br /> Birmingham City Cocncil Iqbal Sangha
Post-project management and maintenance 1000 - 5000 k€ Birmingham City Council Iqbal Sangha
Monitoring 1 - 10 k€ Environment Agency Will Groves



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure To help the brook self cleanse to mitigate against misconnections.
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation
Biology Invertebrates
Physico-chemical Oxygen balance
Other reasons for the project Improving the local open space and engaging people with the brook so that they look after it in future.


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank re-grading
Floodplain / River corridor Floodplain reconnection
Planform / Channel pattern Creation of braided channel, River channel widening
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Educating the community on environmental protection and promoting environmentally-friendly behaviour
Other Participation in decision process


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Before the project commenced
Post project during wet weather
Post project, during dry weather


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information