Case study:Short Heath Brook Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
{{Case study image | {{Case study image | ||
|File name=Full Spate 070612.jpg | |File name=Full Spate 070612.jpg | ||
|Caption= | |Caption= Post project during wet weather | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study image | {{Case study image |
Revision as of 09:15, 23 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 52° 31' 44.13" N, 1° 51' 9.35" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Social benefits, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Will |
Main contact surname | Groves |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | Birmingham City Council/ Witton Lodge Community Assoication/ Friends of Witton Lakes |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | Bleak Hill Recreation Ground |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB104028046840 |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | River Tame from Conf of the two arms to R Blythe |
Pre-project morphology | Straightened, Artificial channel |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | Yes |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Quick run-off |
Dominant substrate | Silt |
River corridor land use | Parklands garden |
Average bankfull channel width category | Less than 2 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | Less than 0.5 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2011/10/28 |
Works started | 2011/11/01 |
Works completed | 2012/02/17 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | more than 10000 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 126587126,587 k€ <br />126,587,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Section 106 (planning gain) and Environment Agency |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | 5000 - 10000 k€ | 1000010,000 k€ <br />10,000,000 € <br /> | Birmingham City Council/ Environment Agency | Will | Groves |
Stakeholder engagement and communication | Less than 1 k€ | Birmingham City Council | Chris | Baker | |
Works and works supervision | more than 10000 k€ | 126587126,587 k€ <br />126,587,000 € <br /> | Birmingham City Cocncil | Iqbal | Sangha |
Post-project management and maintenance | 1000 - 5000 k€ | Birmingham City Council | Iqbal | Sangha | |
Monitoring | 1 - 10 k€ | Environment Agency | Will | Groves |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Bank re-grading |
Floodplain / River corridor | Floodplain reconnection |
Planform / Channel pattern | Creation of braided channel, River channel widening |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | Educating the community on environmental protection and promoting environmentally-friendly behaviour |
Other | Participation in decision process |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information