Case study:Short Heath Brook Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.528924435853, -1.8525982666016 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Short Heath Brook Project |Status=In ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=500
|Project started=2011/10/28
|Works started=2011/11/01
|Works completed=2012/02/17
|Total cost category=more than 10000 k€
|Total1 cost=126587
|Funding sources=Section 106 (planning gain) and Environment Agency
|Investigation and design cost category=5000 - 10000 k€
|Invst and design cost=10000
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Birmingham City Council/ Environment Agency
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Will
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Groves
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Birmingham City Council
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Chris
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Baker
|Works1 and supervision cost category=more than 10000 k€
|Wrk and supervision cost=126587
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Birmingham City Cocncil
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Iqbal
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Sangha
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=1000 - 5000 k€
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Birmingham City Council
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Iqbal
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Sangha
|Monitoring1 cost category=1 - 10 k€
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Environment Agency
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Will
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Groves
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures}}

Revision as of 08:27, 23 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 31' 44.13" N, 1° 51' 9.35" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Will
Main contact surname Groves
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br />
Project started 2011/10/28
Works started 2011/11/01
Works completed 2012/02/17
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) 126587126,587 k€ <br />126,587,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Section 106 (planning gain) and Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 5000 - 10000 k€ 1000010,000 k€ <br />10,000,000 € <br /> Birmingham City Council/ Environment Agency Will Groves
Stakeholder engagement and communication Less than 1 k€ Birmingham City Council Chris Baker
Works and works supervision more than 10000 k€ 126587126,587 k€ <br />126,587,000 € <br /> Birmingham City Cocncil Iqbal Sangha
Post-project management and maintenance 1000 - 5000 k€ Birmingham City Council Iqbal Sangha
Monitoring 1 - 10 k€ Environment Agency Will Groves



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information