Case study:Saltburn Gill ironstones mines: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
The River Restoration Centre would like to thank Peter Aldred from the Environment Agency for providing the information and photographs for this case study. | The River Restoration Centre would like to thank Peter Aldred from the Environment Agency for providing the information and photographs for this case study. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Saltburn Gill mine discharge point.JPG | |||
|Caption=Mine discharge point | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Impact on the Saltburn Gill stream I.JPG | |||
|Caption=Impact on the Saltburn Gill stream | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Impact on the Saltburn Gill stream II.JPG | |||
|Caption=Impact on the Saltburn Gill stream | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=The Saltburn Gill joining the Skelton Beck in Saltburn.JPG | |||
|Caption=The Saltburn Gill joining the Skelton Beck in Saltburn | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Aerial photo of the lower end of the Saltburn Beck.jpg | |||
|Caption=Aerial photo of the lower end of the Saltburn Beck | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Saltburn Gill Catch trib of North Sea | |Subcatchment=Saltburn Gill Catch trib of North Sea | ||
Line 62: | Line 86: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | {{Case study documents |
Revision as of 09:02, 9 October 2013
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Social benefits, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Peter |
Main contact surname | Aldred |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, DEFRA, The Coal Authority (UK) |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This on-going project targets a section of the Saltburn Gill that was negatively impacted by Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) from abandoned mine workings, located upstream of the discharge point. Historically, East Cleveland was a major source of ore for the Teesside iron and steel industry, specially from the 1850’s until the early 1960’s. Afterwards, the decline of the mining activity resulted in an uncontrolled abandonment of the working mines in within the region.
In 1999, the mine discharge rose the typical iron levels of the Saltburn Beck from around 0.1 milligrammes per litre (mg/l) to in excess of 1200mg/l. Over 330kg of iron ochre is deposited on the stream bed every day. In one year, this is the equivalent of over 100 tonnes of iron into the North Sea. The devastating effects on the ecology readily appeared, mainly due to the drastic depletion in the oxygen levels. A biological impact survey of the stream showed that the pollution reduced the water quality of the beck from good to bad status along to 2 km of the watercourse from the discharge point to the sea.
The Saltburn Gill Action Group (SGAG) was set up in 2005 as a community action group. Assistance was given by The Environment Agency, Teesside University, the local Wildlife Trust, the Parish Council and others to try to find a solution to this problem. Then, several site investigations were carried out with insights to build up a treatment plant.
Funding from DEFRA and the Environment Agency allowed the development of a treatment scheme and construction started in December 2012. This will involve a large pumping borehole into the mine workings and settlement ponds and reed beds. It is expected to start pumping in the spring or early summer of 2013 and final drying up of the polluting discharge and construction of the final parts of the scheme may not happen until 2014-15.
The River Restoration Centre would like to thank Peter Aldred from the Environment Agency for providing the information and photographs for this case study.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|