Case study:Abbotts Hall Managed Realignment Scheme

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: The following coordinate was not recognized: 0.84556009184722; 51.78464759917050.The following coordinate was not recognized: 0.84556009184722; 51.78464759917050.

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Abbotts Hall Managed Realignment Scheme\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Habitat and biodiversity\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Abbotts Hall Managed Realignment Scheme","link":"","lat":51.784833893735,"lon":0.84766387939453,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country	England
Main contact forename	Dave
Main contact surname	Smart
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Essex Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site	http://http://www.essexwt.org.uk/visitor centres nature reserves/abbotts hall farm/
Partner organisations	English Nature, Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Abbots Hall

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

The location of the project is in the North bank of the Salcott channel tributary of the Blackwater Estuary (Essex). The strategy was creation of new coastal (mudflat, saltmarsh, transitional grassland and grazing marsh) and freshwater habitats, together with the provision of natural flood defence. In order to achieve tidal inundation of the area available (49ha of the 85ha scheme are intertidal), five breaches were required along 3km of hard defences. The largest breach was 100m in width with a level of +1.5m OD (approximately MHWN), and the remaining four breaches between 10-20m (at higher levels). The main breach was included to moderate outflow by acting as a sill, reducing the tidal prism of the site, and controlling the phasing of exchange between Salcott Creek and the site itself. Phase 1 of the scheme was undertaken in 1996 and consisted of a regulated tidal exchange on part of the site (20ha). Pre-breach, a three year monitoring programme was undertaken to ensure appropriate scheme design for the site and to provide a baseline for determining its effects. Following realignment, a further five year monitoring programme was established to assess the effects and provide further information for the design of future schemes. Monitoring undertaken: Accretion / erosion.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.

The following aspects were monitored for at least two years (vegetation and birds longer): accretion / erosion on site (altimetry); accretion/erosion off site; scour (in breach B); bathymetry (one off); tidal levels and velocities; suspended solids off site; salinity off site; invertebrates off site (one off); vegetation; birds; fish; amphibians/reptiles

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.

According to the Essex Wildlife Trust (2005), the scheme has been effective in safeguarding the local natural environment of the Salcott Channel and the West Mersea Oyster Fishery downstream of the realignment site. The additional monitoring works undertaken at the request of the local oystermen have demonstrated no noticeable effects on their activities. The natural slope of the site has benefited small fry which have been observed rising through the vegetation with the tide. The gradual slope allows for the zonation of vegetation and provides a mosaic of habitats for a range of sizes and species of fish. The semi permanent pools, which are inundated on high tides, serve as feeding and refuge areas over a tidal cycle. On one occasion, 2000 herring/sprat were caught using a seine net in one tidal pool. This illustrates the value of the realignment site as being beneficial for both commercial and recreational fisheries in the Blackwater estuary. The tidal regime monitoring (Environment Agency, 2003) determined that no clear evidence of any significant change in upstream tidal levels following implementation was found, which is consistent with the predictions of change (these were of the order of a few millimetres). The general direction and phasing of flood and ebb flows remained unchanged (this was considered unsurprising given the generous configuration of the main drainage channel (Salcott Creek)). There seemed to be a slight increase in current speeds at the station closest to the realignment (as well as a 15% increase at another station). These increases were most marked on the ebb tide as water receded seawards. It was noted that the observed increase in current speeds compared favourably with anticipated increase. The absolute increase in velocity does not appear to have produced any significant erosion of the channel bed. No major hydrodynamic changes were observed in Salcott Creek in the period immediately after the breach (when potential changes would be expected to be most pronounced). By ‘restraining tidal outflow’ the main breach also promoted sediment deposition and accretion which consequently led to elevation increases and vegetation colonisation. The monitoring allayed local fears with regards to sediment concentrations that the realignment could generate ‘sediment plumes’ as no significant increase in sediment concentrations immediately after the breach were observed. This is consistent with little erosion being observed. Monitoring of suspended sediment concentrations was able to demonstrate that the realignment site was acting as a net sink for sediment (with sediment deposition described as ‘significant’) and not as a source and was thus able to dispel concerns associated with accumulations of fine sediment that were reported to occur downstream. The Essex Wildlife Trust(2005) states that ‘it turned out that the ‘problem’ was caused by a new colony of tubeworms and was unrelated to the Abbotts Hall realignment’.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

The managed realignment at Abbotts Hall (shortly after first inundation;breaches circled in pink) - Google Earth derived aerial view

Water flowing into the site through the main breach (Taken by: C. Scot, ABPmer, 2004)

South-easterly view across site from bird hide (Taken by: C. Scot, ABPmer, May 2010)

Catchment and subcatchment Select a catchment/subcatchment Site Edit site Name Abbotts Hall WFD water body codes WFD (national) typology WFD water body name Pre-project morphology Reference morphology Desired post project morphology Heavily modified water body No National/international site designation Local/regional site designations Protected species present No Invasive species present No Species of interest Dominant hydrology Dominant substrate River corridor land use Arable Average bankfull channel width category Average bankfull channel width (m) Average bankfull channel depth category Average bankfull channel depth (m) Mean discharge category Mean annual discharge (m3/s) Average channel gradient category Average channel gradient Average unit stream power (W/m2) Project background Edit project background Reach length directly affected (m) Project started Works started Works completed Project completed Total cost category Total cost (k€) Benefit to cost ratio Funding sources WWF and the Heritage Lottery Fund Cost for project phases Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname Investigation and design Stakeholder engagement and communication Works and works supervision Post-project management and maintenance Monitoring Reasons for river restoration Edit reasons for restoration Mitigation of a pressure Hydromorphology Biology Physico-chemical Other reasons for the project Measures Edit Measures Structural measures Bank/bed modifications Floodplain / River corridor Planform / Channel pattern Other Non-structural measures Management interventions Social measures (incl. engagement) Other Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information